Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/9282160/movement
Access Date: December 13, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
Elgin National Watch Co.
Grade: 258
| Manufacturer: | Elgin |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Elgin, Illinois | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 9282160 | |
| Grade: | 258 | |
| Model: | 7 | |
| Class: | 94 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1901 | |
| Run Quantity: | 4,000 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 2 of 4 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 6,500 | |
| Size: | 16s | |
| Jewels: | 15j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
| Plate: | 3/4 Plate | |
| Barrel: | Going | |
| Train: | Quick | |
| Regulator: | Moseley | |
| Adjusted: | No | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| U.S. Patents: | 77078, 596407, 585025 | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 3770.258G2.16S705.167M105.O1033.P1765.15J1070 | |
| Data Research: |
1904 Elgin Serial List 1915 Elgin Serial List 1927/1950 Elgin Serial List |
|
| Database Version: | v52.508 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 19.57 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 7.50 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.013% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 34 (0.85%) | |
Production Metrics Tree: Grade 258
Target Profile: 16S-M7-15J-ONP-U
| Elgin Grade 258 (All Variations): 6,500 ETP |
| 16S: 6,500 100.00% 16s, Grade 258 |
| 16S-M7: 6,500 100.00% 16s, Grade 258, Model 7 |
| 16S-M7-15J: 6,500 100.00% 16s, Grade 258, Model 7, 15 Jewels |
| 16S-M7-15J-ONP: 6,500 100.00% 16s, Grade 258, Model 7, 15 Jewels, Openface/Pendant/Nickel |
| 16S-M7-15J-ONP-U: 6,500 100.00% |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 34 watches in the population registry for this run with 5 images.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Rickybe Supporter 8 · November 26, 2024
Serial Number 9280243 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 30, 2024
Serial Number 9282890 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 21, 2024
Serial Number 9282890 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · December 11, 2023
Serial Number 9280408 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 9, 2020
Serial Number 9280307 was reported as accurate.
Shabro 6 · March 5, 2019
Serial Number 9282363 was reported as accurate.
todix144 76 · November 24, 2018
Serial Number 9283294 was reported as accurate.
bogus22 Supporter 83 · May 26, 2018
Serial Number 9281611 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 27, 2017
Serial Number 9282160 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 18, 2017
Serial Number 9282047 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 26, 2016
Serial Number 9282148 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 4, 2016
Serial Number 9281416 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 3, 2016
Serial Number 9280732 was reported as accurate.
todix144 76 · September 23, 2015
Serial Number 9283294 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 10, 2015
Serial Number 9282474 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 24, 2014
Serial Number 9280151 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 27, 2014
Serial Number 9282088 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 12, 2013
Serial Number 9280804 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 23, 2012
Serial Number 9281377 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 28, 2012
Serial Number 9280166 was reported as accurate.
