Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/12193256
Access Date: April 25, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
American Waltham Watch Co.
Grade: Seaside
| Manufacturer: | Waltham |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Waltham, Massachusetts | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 12193256 | |
| Grade: | Seaside | |
| Model: | 1890 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1903 | |
| Run Quantity: | 6,000 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 79 of 139 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 1,008,199 | |
| Size: | 6s | |
| Jewels: | 15j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Hunting | |
| Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
| Plate: | 3/4 Split Plate | |
| Hairspring: | Breguet | |
| Adjusted: | No | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| Data Research: |
1954 Waltham "Gray Book" List NAWCC Waltham Serial Digest |
|
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 18092.G328.6S636.61890M345.H5651.P4068.15J4232 | |
| Database Version: | v52.245 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 3,035.46 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 2,762.26 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 3.017% | |
| Registry Population: | 17 (0.28%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | -12.37% Analyzing 1,201 Sales | |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 17 watches in the population registry for this run.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Anonymous · December 9, 2022
Serial Number 12194094 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 20, 2022
Serial Number 12191566 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 11, 2022
Serial Number 12194197 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 17, 2022
Serial Number 12195331 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · January 7, 2022
Serial Number 12196030 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 3, 2021
Serial Number 12195337 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 3, 2021
Serial Number 12195337 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 5, 2020
Serial Number 12190906 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 5, 2019
Serial Number 12191125 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · January 23, 2019
Serial Number 12191291 was reported as accurate.
harrington 99 · December 26, 2018
Serial Number 12193256 was reported as accurate.
rtwatches 943 · January 15, 2018
Serial Number 12191718 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 13, 2017
Serial Number 12192487 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 11, 2017
Serial Number 12192487 was reported as accurate.
Bheaven 1 · June 23, 2017
Serial Number 12191278 was reported as accurate.
sanjosetom 301 · May 25, 2017
Serial Number 12194493 was reported as accurate.
harris498 53 · October 22, 2016
Serial Number 12192424 was reported as inaccurate.
AlbyS1 12 · September 3, 2016
Serial Number 12192300 was reported as accurate.
modelscarplains 39 · June 11, 2016
Serial Number 12193256 was reported as accurate.
modelscarplains 39 · June 11, 2016
Serial Number 12193256 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 25, 2015
Serial Number 12192300 was reported as accurate.
jruck48 13 · May 15, 2015
Serial Number 12193650 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 29, 2014
Serial Number 12192300 was reported as accurate.
harrington 99 · September 26, 2014
Serial Number 12193256 was reported as accurate.
Wyncroft Supporter 17 · June 6, 2014
Serial Number 12194991 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 16, 2013
Serial Number 12192246 was reported as accurate.
