Pocket Watch Database
Information Provided by PocketWatchDatabase.com:
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/e.-howard-co/300790
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/e.-howard-co/300790
Access Date: December 23, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
E. Howard & Co.
Grade: No. 2
| Manufacturer: | E. Howard & Co. |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Roxbury, Massachusetts | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 300790 | |
| Grade: | No. 2 | |
| Model: | Series VIII | |
| Estimated Production Date: | March 21, 1885 - May 6, 1886 | |
| Size: | N | |
| Jewels: | 15j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
| Movement Finish: | Gilt | |
| Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
| Plate: | 3/4 Plate | |
| Regulator: | Patent | |
| Adjusted: | Yes | |
| Adjusted to Position: | No | |
| Adjusted to Temperature: | Yes | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 2816.G199.S1519.M5.O5.P1274.15J2811 | |
| Data Research: |
E. Howard & Co. Factory Abstracts (Bob Rolfe) |
|
| Database Version: | v52.518 | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 4 (0.70%) | |
|
Research Note: Mixed Run: Some movements without patent regulators (No. 1), unadjusted with patent regulator (No. 2), adjusted to Heat and Cold (No. 3), and Fully Adjusted (No. 6)
|
||
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 4 watches in the population registry for this run with 2 images.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
2mnyboxers Supporter 408 · May 10, 2023
Serial Number 301035 was reported as accurate.
