Pocket Watch Database
Information Provided by PocketWatchDatabase.com:
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/e.-howard-co/600122
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/e.-howard-co/600122
Access Date: April 17, 2025
From the American Horology Archive:
E. Howard & Co.
Grade: No. 8
| Manufacturer: | E. Howard & Co. |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Roxbury, Massachusetts | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 600122 | |
| Grade: | No. 8 | |
| Model: | Series XI | |
| Estimated Production Date: | November 2, 1895 - June 24, 1896 | |
| Size: | L | |
| Jewels: | 17j | |
| Jewel Setting: | Raised Gold Settings (Screw-Set) | |
| Movement Configuration: | Hunting | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
| Plate: | 3/4 Split Plate | |
| Regulator: | Reed | |
| Adjusted: | Yes | |
| Adjusted to Position: | No | |
| Adjusted to Temperature: | Yes | |
| Adjusted to Isochronism: | Yes | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 3363.G2.S1185.M2.H1710.P1818.17J6 | |
| Data Research: |
E. Howard & Co. Factory Abstracts (Bob Rolfe) |
|
| Database Version: | v52.636 | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 3 (2.50%) | |
|
Research Note: Mixed Run: Grade 8 (Adjusted to Heat & Cold) and Grade 10 (Fully Adjusted)
|
||
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 3 watches in the population registry for this run.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
oilseed Supporter 472 · January 3, 2025
Serial Number 600122 was reported as accurate.
