Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/6062
Access Date: December 24, 2024
"6062" could possibly indicate the grade of the watch and not the serial number of your movement. Serial numbers are usually more than a few digits.
From the American Horology Archive:
Elgin National Watch Co.
Grade: 57
G.M. Wheeler
| Manufacturer: | Elgin |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Elgin, Illinois | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 6062 | |
| Grade: | 57 | |
| Variation: | G.M. Wheeler | |
| Model: | 1 | |
| Class: | 4 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1867 | |
| Run Quantity: | 1,000 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 1 of 87 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 75,146 | |
| Variant Est. Production: | 70,346 (18S-M1-11J) | |
| Size: | 18s | |
| Jewels: | 11j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Adaptable | |
| Movement Finish: | Gilt | |
| Movement Setting: | Key | |
| Plate: | Full Plate | |
| Barrel: | Going | |
| Train: | Slow | |
| Regulator: | Plain | |
| Adjusted: | No | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| U.S. Patents: | 77078 | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 8.57G1.18S7.181M7.H7.K7.11J1 | |
| Data Research: |
1896 Elgin Serial List 1904 Elgin Serial List 1915 Elgin Serial List 1927/1950 Elgin Serial List |
|
| Database Version: | v52.526 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 226.24 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 87.37 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.149% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 17 (1.70%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | -3.11% Analyzing 399 Sales | |
Production Metrics Tree: Grade 57
Target Profile: 18S-M1-11J-HGK-U-G.M. WHEELER
| Elgin Grade 57 (All Variations): 75,146 ETP | |
| 18S: 75,146 100.00% 18s, Grade 57 |
|
| 18S-M1: 75,146 100.00% 18s, Grade 57, Model 1 |
|
| 18S-M1-11J: 70,346 93.61% 18s, Grade 57, Model 1, 11 Jewels |
Other: 4,800
Other Jewels or Unclassified |
| 18S-M1-11J-HGK: 70,346 93.61% 18s, Grade 57, Model 1, 11 Jewels, Adaptable/Key/Gilt |
|
| 18S-M1-11J-HGK-U: 70,346 93.61% | |
| 18S-M1-11J-HGK-U-G.M. WHEELER: 70,346 93.61% | |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 17 watches in the population registry for this run with 3 images.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Anonymous · November 5, 2023
Serial Number 6851 was reported as accurate.
Bigbobhoss Supporter 45 · May 7, 2023
Serial Number 6471 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 16, 2022
Serial Number 6722 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 19, 2021
Serial Number 6230 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 25, 2020
Serial Number 6626 was reported as accurate.
mlat2012 Supporter 55 · November 24, 2020
Serial Number 6824 was reported as accurate.
mlat2012 Supporter 55 · November 8, 2020
Serial Number 6824 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 17, 2020
Serial Number 6741 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 7, 2020
Serial Number 6498 was reported as inaccurate.
charlesleonard 5 · February 20, 2019
Serial Number 6562 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 6, 2019
Serial Number 6336 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · June 7, 2018
Serial Number 6749 was reported as accurate.
Kerndog 2 · February 18, 2018
Serial Number 6944 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 10, 2017
Serial Number 6135 was reported as inaccurate.
mlat2012 Supporter 55 · July 5, 2016
Serial Number 7000 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 17, 2016
Serial Number 6874 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 4, 2015
Serial Number 6497 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 24, 2015
Serial Number 6518 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 19, 2015
Serial Number 6497 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · September 23, 2014
Serial Number 6852 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · October 1, 2013
Serial Number 6311 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 15, 2013
Serial Number 6540 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · July 10, 2013
Serial Number 6497 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · May 18, 2013
Serial Number 6062 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 13, 2013
Serial Number 6067 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 13, 2013
Serial Number 6067 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 2, 2013
Serial Number 6062 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 13, 2013
Serial Number 6943 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · April 10, 2013
Serial Number 6573 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · April 1, 2013
Serial Number 6131 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · March 7, 2013
Serial Number 6062 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 7, 2013
Serial Number 6067 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 30, 2013
Serial Number 6387 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 26, 2012
Serial Number 6540 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · September 13, 2012
Serial Number 6498 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · August 14, 2012
Serial Number 6445 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 3, 2012
Serial Number 6226 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 24, 2012
Serial Number 6011 was reported as accurate.
-
From This Runuploaded by mlat2012
-
From This Runuploaded by mlat2012
-
From This Runuploaded by mlat2012
-
uploaded by Knotweaver
-
uploaded by fabianmwb
-
uploaded by winterwolf
-
uploaded by casillas
-
uploaded by xtoolmanx
-
uploaded by dfurtado
-
uploaded by pmwas1