Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/hamilton/162588
Access Date: December 24, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
Hamilton Watch Co.
Grade: 926
Private Label(s) in Run:
J.W. Neasham - Ottumwa, Iowa.
T.F. Rude - Cuba, N.Y .
What is a Private Label?Manufacturer: | Hamilton | |
Manufacturer Location: | Lancaster, Pennsylvania | |
Movement Serial Number: | 162588 | |
Grade: | 926 | |
Model: | 1 | |
Class: | 3 | |
Estimated Production Year: | 1901 | |
Run Quantity: | 1,000 | |
Grade/Model Run: | 20 of 87 | |
Grade/Model Total Production: | 83,406 | |
Size: | 18s | |
Jewels: | 17j | |
Jewel Setting: | Screw-Set | |
Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
Movement Setting: | Lever | |
Plate: | Full Plate | |
Regulator: | Goldthwait | |
Hairspring: | Breguet | |
Standard Dial Type: | Single-Sunk | |
Adjusted: | Yes | |
Adjusted to Position: | No | |
Adjusted to Temperature: | Yes | |
Adjusted to Isochronism: | No | |
Railroad Grade: | No | |
Dial Feet Locations: | 2.6, 18.0, 38.2 | |
Case: | Various | |
Run ID: | 464.926G20.18S268.181M138.O243.L261.17J278 | |
Data Research: |
1953 Hamilton Serial List |
|
Database Version: | v52.518 | |
Advanced Metrics | ||
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 251.11 | |
PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 110.18 | |
Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.783% | |
Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 28 (2.80%) | |
$ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | -7.30% Analyzing 680 Sales |
Population Registry for This Run
Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are 28 watches in the population registry for this run with 2 images.
|
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Billibrit 10 · May 18, 2023
Serial Number 162535 was reported as inaccurate.
giddykippa 235 · May 27, 2022
Serial Number 162507 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 18, 2021
Serial Number 162507 was reported as inaccurate.
Waltham21j 121 · November 9, 2020
Serial Number 162588 was reported as accurate.
Waltham21j 121 · July 13, 2020
Serial Number 162588 was reported as inaccurate.
Waltham21j 121 · July 12, 2020
Serial Number 162588 was reported as inaccurate.
but others not.I don't think any of them are.If a
926 from 1903 is RR grade for the era, as some
wish,then why isn't a 1902 run?
Anonymous · June 22, 2018
Serial Number 162452 was reported as inaccurate.
DENNAN123 5 · November 24, 2017
Serial Number 162532 was reported as inaccurate.
jacobwalls07 143 · October 13, 2017
Serial Number 162335 was reported as accurate.
Gimparoo Supporter 703 · July 13, 2017
Serial Number 162856 was reported as accurate.