Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/hampden/1027331
Access Date: November 27, 2024
Due to the lack of existing factory records, our Hampden Watch Co. database has been reconstructed using observations of known watches.
As a result, the information may contain inaccuracies. Please let us know if you have details that can improve the database.
From the American Horology Archive:
Hampden Watch Co.
Grade: John Hancock
Gold Jewel Settings
Manufacturer: | Hampden | |
Manufacturer Location: | Canton, Ohio | |
Movement Serial Number: | 1027331 | |
Grade: | John Hancock | |
Model: | 4 | |
Estimated Production Year: | 1897 | |
Size: | 18s | |
Jewels: | 21j | |
Movement Configuration: | Hunting | |
Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
Movement Setting: | Lever | |
Plate: | Full Plate | |
Regulator: | Hampden Star | |
Adjusted: | Yes | |
Adjusted # of Positions: | 5 | |
Adjusted to Temperature: | Yes | |
Railroad Grade: | Yes | |
Dial Feet Locations: | 14, 36.5, 52 | |
Case: | Various | |
Database Version: | v52.465 | |
Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 15 (1.73%) |
Population Registry for This Run
Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are 15 watches in the population registry for this run with 5 images.
|
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
GFHunter Supporter 28 · October 25, 2024
Serial Number 1027975 was reported as inaccurate.
cbzimm Supporter 469 · January 7, 2022
Serial Number 1027142 was reported as accurate.
RobTaylor 2 · February 24, 2019
Serial Number 1027321 was reported as inaccurate.
called a "Katy Special". It appears to be
identical to the " John Hancock". If I'm mistaken
I would appreciate correction information. Thanks
-
From This Run
uploaded by ClipperCargo
-
From This Run
uploaded by barefootiniowa
-
From This Run
uploaded by Coppereye84
-
From This Run
uploaded by cbzimm
-
From This Run
uploaded by TimFitz
-
uploaded by HeidiDarsow
-
uploaded by RedMiata2009
-
uploaded by redjms
-
uploaded by cougwatch