Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/new-york-standard-watch-co/1011620-1597
Access Date: May 14, 2024
Due to the lack of existing factory records, our New York Standard database has been reconstructed using observations of known watches.
As a result, the information may contain inaccuracies. Please let us know if you have details that can improve the database.
From the American Horology Archive:
New York Standard
Grade: 1597
Multiple Movements Assigned Same Serial
| Manufacturer: | New York Standard Watch Co. |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Jersey City, New Jersey | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 1011620 | |
| Grade: | 1597 | |
| Model: | K | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1920 | |
| Size: | 16s | |
| Jewels: | 15j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
| Plate: | Bridge Plate | |
| Train: | Quick | |
| Regulator: | Patent | |
| Hairspring: | Breguet | |
| Adjusted: | No | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| Movement Markings: | New York Standard Watch Co. U.S.A. 15 Jewels Made in U.S.A. |
|
| Case: | Various | |
| Database Version: | v52.270 | |
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · December 5, 2023
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · December 5, 2023
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 24, 2023
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · October 23, 2023
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
jesbob7 Supporter 37 · August 21, 2023
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 11, 2023
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as inaccurate.
cmould Supporter 192 · March 7, 2023
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as inaccurate.
number 1011620.
My movement has 1011620 stamp on the dial plate
with 46 scratched after it. Then on the front is
number 27946.
cmould Supporter 192 · March 7, 2023
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
cmould Supporter 192 · March 7, 2023
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · September 6, 2022
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · September 6, 2022
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · August 19, 2022
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · August 17, 2022
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · August 16, 2022
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · August 16, 2022
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · August 16, 2022
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 20, 2022
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
HerbertTrw Supporter 119 · March 10, 2022
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · November 13, 2021
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
HerbertTrw Supporter 119 · November 1, 2021
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
nicnic Supporter 387 · June 11, 2021
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · June 8, 2021
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · April 7, 2021
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 24, 2021
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 20, 2021
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4718 · February 11, 2021
Serial Number 1011620 was reported as accurate.
