Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/new-york-standard-watch-co/35694-excelsior
Access Date: November 21, 2024
Due to the lack of existing factory records, our New York Standard database has been reconstructed using observations of known watches.
As a result, the information may contain inaccuracies. Please let us know if you have details that can improve the database.
From the American Horology Archive:
New York Standard
Grade: Excelsior
First Run.
Manufacturer: | New York Standard Watch Co. | |
Manufacturer Location: | Jersey City, New Jersey | |
Movement Serial Number: | 35694 | |
Grade: | Excelsior | |
Model: | AJ | |
Estimated Production Year: | 1913 | |
Run Quantity: | 99,000 | |
Grade/Model Run: | 1 of 1 | |
Grade/Model Total Production: | 99,000 | |
Size: | 0s | |
Jewels: | Array | |
Movement Configuration: | Hunting or Openface | |
Movement Setting: | Lever or Pendant | |
Balance Type: | Expansion | |
Train: | Quick | |
Regulator: | Plain | |
Hairspring: | Breguet | |
Adjusted: | No | |
Railroad Grade: | No | |
Movement Markings: | Excelsior NYSWCo. U.S.A. |
|
Case: | Various | |
Run ID: | 6.G1.0S4.M1.[1.[1.J1 | |
Database Version: | v52.450 | |
Advanced Metrics | ||
Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 57 (0.06%) |
Production Metrics Tree: Grade Excelsior
Target Profile: 0S-MAJ-0J-H/ONL/P-U
New York Standard Watch Co. Grade Excelsior (All Variations): 244,000 ETP | |
0S: 99,000 40.57% 0s, Grade Excelsior |
Other: 145,000
Other Sizes or Unclassified |
0S-MAJ: 99,000 40.57% 0s, Grade Excelsior, Model AJ |
|
0S-MAJ-0J: 99,000 40.57% 0s, Grade Excelsior, Model AJ, Array Jewels |
|
0S-MAJ-0J-H/ONL/P: 99,000 40.57% 0s, Grade Excelsior, Model AJ, Array Jewels, Hunting or Openface/Lever or Pendant/Nickel |
|
0S-MAJ-0J-H/ONL/P-U: 99,000 40.57% |
Population Registry for This Run
Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are 57 watches in the population registry for this run with 21 images.
|
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Anonymous · July 19, 2024
Serial Number 13771 was reported as inaccurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · June 29, 2024
Serial Number 31014 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · June 19, 2024
Serial Number 31250 was reported as inaccurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · June 19, 2024
Serial Number 49252 was reported as inaccurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · June 19, 2024
Serial Number 10717 was reported as inaccurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · June 16, 2024
Serial Number 82845 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · June 2, 2024
Serial Number 12500 was reported as accurate.
pmtime Supporter 612 · May 10, 2024
Serial Number 97195 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · December 5, 2023
Serial Number 1945 was reported as inaccurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · December 5, 2023
Serial Number 15755 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · October 25, 2023
Serial Number 35327 was reported as accurate.
cbzimm Supporter 469 · July 13, 2023
Serial Number 38217 was reported as accurate.
ChrisG Top Contributor Supporter 601 · January 4, 2023
Serial Number 52271 was reported as inaccurate.
standard 30 is not showing up on the DB page for
this model. Thx
ChrisG Top Contributor Supporter 601 · November 22, 2022
Serial Number 52271 was reported as inaccurate.
serial # has plain gilt plates. Thx.
Anonymous · October 6, 2022
Serial Number 77022 was reported as inaccurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · September 6, 2022
Serial Number 52379 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · August 19, 2022
Serial Number 36878 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · August 19, 2022
Serial Number 56454 was reported as inaccurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · August 18, 2022
Serial Number 34107 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · August 18, 2022
Serial Number 7984 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · August 17, 2022
Serial Number 57657 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · August 16, 2022
Serial Number 80398 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · August 16, 2022
Serial Number 26269 was reported as accurate.
dholmes Supporter 27 · April 16, 2022
Serial Number 3165 was reported as inaccurate.
3165.
Bostonjoe Top Contributor Supporter 196 · December 12, 2021
Serial Number 83075 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 2, 2021
Serial Number 79324 was reported as inaccurate.
train side, not two piece.
mcopper 55 · August 9, 2021
Serial Number 14703 was reported as accurate.
gsimon Supporter 3 · April 14, 2021
Serial Number 87254 was reported as accurate.
Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · March 23, 2021
Serial Number 73530 was reported as inaccurate.
LadyFaire 2 · January 16, 2021
Serial Number 11378 was reported as accurate.
LadyFaire 2 · January 16, 2021
Serial Number 34131 was reported as accurate.
LadyFaire 2 · January 16, 2021
Serial Number 34131 was reported as accurate.
joetime 2 · January 10, 2021
Serial Number 48808 was reported as accurate.
-
From This Run
uploaded by LadyFaire
-
From This Run
uploaded by TerryfromCanada
-
From This Run
Image Source/Credit: eBay Auction
-
From This Run
Image Source/Credit: eBay Auction
-
From This Run
Image Source/Credit: eBay Auction
-
From This Run
Image Source/Credit: eBay Auction
-
From This Run
uploaded by JenZo82
-
From This Run
Image Source/Credit: eBay Auction