Pocket Watch Database

Due to the lack of existing factory records, our New York Standard database has been reconstructed using observations of known watches.
As a result, the information may contain inaccuracies. Please let us know if you have details that can improve the database.

From the American Horology Archive:

New York Standard

Grade: Standard

First Run. Introduced February 1889.

Manufacturer: New York Standard Watch Co. Question Mark
Manufacturer Location: Jersey City, New Jersey Question Mark
Movement Serial Number: 45195 Question Mark
Grade: Standard Question Mark
Model: 2 Question Mark
Estimated Production Year: 1890 Question Mark
Run Quantity: 16,000 Question Mark
Grade/Model Run: 1 of 1 Question Mark
Grade/Model Total Production: 16,000 Question Mark
Size: 18s Question Mark
Jewels: 7j Question Mark
Movement Configuration: Openface Question Mark
Movement Finish: Gilt Question Mark
Movement Setting: Lever Question Mark
Plate: Full Plate Question Mark
Balance Type: Uncut Expansion Question Mark
Adjusted: No Question Mark
Railroad Grade: No Question Mark
U.S. Patents: 365595 Question Mark
Movement Markings: New York Standard Watch Co.
Case: Various Question Mark
Run ID: 10.G1.18S2.182M1.H3.K1.7J7 Question Mark
Database Version: v52.528 Question Mark
Advanced Metrics
Registry Population:
Scoped for This Run Only
16 (0.10%) Question Mark
Research Note: #422264: Verified as Damaskeened Gilt Finish.

Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:

Does this information describe your movement accurately?

Verification Reports for this Run

The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.


MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · June 19, 2024

Serial Number 49252 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: 6s 7j Movement

Anonymous · March 1, 2024

Serial Number 42609 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · February 20, 2024

Serial Number 42609 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · February 20, 2024

Serial Number 42609 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · October 25, 2023

Serial Number 35327 was reported as accurate.

cbzimm Supporter 469 · July 13, 2023

Serial Number 38217 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · September 2, 2022

Serial Number 36878 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 19, 2022

Serial Number 36878 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 18, 2022

Serial Number 34107 was reported as accurate.

LadyFaire 2 · January 16, 2021

Serial Number 34131 was reported as accurate.

LadyFaire 2 · January 16, 2021

Serial Number 34131 was reported as accurate.

joetime 2 · January 10, 2021

Serial Number 48808 was reported as accurate.