Pocket Watch Database


Due to the lack of existing factory records, our New York Standard database has been reconstructed using observations of known watches.
As a result, the information may contain inaccuracies. Please let us know if you have details that can improve the database.

From the American Horology Archive:
New York Standard Watch Co. Grade 302 Pocket Watch
New York Standard Watch Co. Grade 302 Pocket Watch

New York Standard

Grade: 302

Standard U.S.A.

Manufacturer: New York Standard Watch Co. Question Mark
Manufacturer Location: Jersey City, New Jersey Question Mark
Movement Serial Number: 90217 Question Mark
Grade: 302 Question Mark
Model: 21 Question Mark
Estimated Production Year: 1910 Question Mark
Run Quantity: 105,000 Question Mark
Grade/Model Run: 1 of 1 Question Mark
Grade/Model Total Production: 105,000 Question Mark
Size: 0s Question Mark
Jewels: 7j Question Mark
Movement Configuration: Hunting Question Mark
Movement Finish: Nickel Question Mark
Movement Setting: Pendant Question Mark
Balance Type: Expansion Question Mark
Adjusted: No Question Mark
Railroad Grade: No Question Mark
Movement Markings: Standard
U.S.A.
Case: Various Question Mark
Run ID: 17.302G1.0S7.021M1.H7.P9.7J13 Question Mark
Database Version: v52.462 Question Mark
Advanced Metrics
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index:
Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
316.13 Question Mark
PWDB Relative Rarity Index:
Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
77.78 Question Mark
Share of Production:
Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
0.822% Question Mark
Registry Population:
Scoped for This Run Only
75 (0.07%) Question Mark

Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:

Does this information describe your movement accurately?

Verification Reports for this Run

The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.


Anonymous · November 20, 2024

Serial Number 122761 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: NYS # 122761 appears to be a standard Grade 31,
Model 4, 7 jewel, open face movement

Anonymous · November 20, 2024

Serial Number 122761 was reported as inaccurate.

No further details were submitted with the report.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · June 16, 2024

Serial Number 82845 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · June 16, 2024

Serial Number 102659 was reported as accurate.

pmtime Supporter 612 · May 10, 2024

Serial Number 97195 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · February 22, 2024

Serial Number 174517 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · November 8, 2023

Serial Number 137179 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · November 1, 2023

Serial Number 109803 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 22, 2023

Serial Number 105251 was reported as accurate.

Szemcsak Supporter 18 · March 20, 2023

Serial Number 106552 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · December 9, 2022

Serial Number 100250 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · September 7, 2022

Serial Number 181182 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · August 18, 2022

Serial Number 167717 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · August 18, 2022

Serial Number 121611 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · August 16, 2022

Serial Number 80398 was reported as accurate.

Zoosolo 154 · June 3, 2022

Serial Number 107733 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · May 20, 2022

Serial Number 102477 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 28, 2022

Serial Number 177274 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 18, 2022

Serial Number 104434 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: The information appears correct, but additionally
this is a DAN PATCH watch and case.
*****@hotmail.com

Anonymous · January 24, 2022

Serial Number 127494 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · December 27, 2021

Serial Number 175670 was reported as inaccurate.

No further details were submitted with the report.

Bostonjoe Top Contributor Supporter 197 · December 12, 2021

Serial Number 83075 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · November 24, 2021

Serial Number 150689 was reported as accurate.

Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · November 13, 2021

Serial Number 183735 was reported as accurate.

Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · November 13, 2021

Serial Number 143413 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · November 4, 2021

Serial Number 138685 was reported as accurate.

Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · August 3, 2021

Serial Number 183735 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: After closer inspection the shape matches the AI
model but the sn doesn’t start with AI and it is
not labeled Ideal
Curator Response: The model "AI" designation is derived from factory classification conventions. These movements were not marked with the prefix like the larger grades, and it is not expected to have one. The lookup information does not imply anything about "Ideal." This run is recorded as marked "Standard U.S.A."

Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · July 23, 2021

Serial Number 143413 was reported as accurate.

Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · July 13, 2021

Serial Number 183735 was reported as accurate.

Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · June 23, 2021

Serial Number 183735 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · May 31, 2021

Serial Number 101345 was reported as inaccurate.

No further details were submitted with the report.

Anonymous · May 31, 2021

Serial Number 167862 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · April 27, 2021

Serial Number 108421 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · April 17, 2021

Serial Number 112775 was reported as accurate.

gsimon Supporter 3 · April 14, 2021

Serial Number 87254 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · April 13, 2021

Serial Number 102089 was reported as accurate.

Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · April 7, 2021

Serial Number 183735 was reported as inaccurate.

No further details were submitted with the report.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5269 · March 1, 2021

Serial Number 181609 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · February 13, 2021

Serial Number 157918 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · January 29, 2021

Serial Number 143918 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · January 17, 2021

Serial Number 169563 was reported as accurate.

New York Standard Watch Co. Grade 302 Pocket Watch
New York Standard Watch Co. Grade 302 Pocket Watch