Pocket Watch Database

Due to the lack of existing factory records, our New York Standard database has been reconstructed using observations of known watches.
As a result, the information may contain inaccuracies. Please let us know if you have details that can improve the database.

From the American Horology Archive:
New York Standard Watch Co. Grade 95 Pocket Watch

New York Standard

Grade: 95

Manufacturer: New York Standard Watch Co. Question Mark
Manufacturer Location: Jersey City, New Jersey Question Mark
Movement Serial Number: BD310601 Question Mark
Grade: 95 Question Mark
Model: BD Question Mark
Estimated Production Year: 1916 Question Mark
Run Quantity: 500,000 Question Mark
Grade/Model Run: 1 of 2 Question Mark
Grade/Model Total Production: 600,000 Question Mark
Size: 16s Question Mark
Jewels: 7j Question Mark
Movement Configuration: Openface Question Mark
Movement Finish: Nickel Question Mark
Movement Setting: Pendant Question Mark
Plate: 3/4 Bridge Plate Question Mark
Train: Quick Question Mark
Hairspring: Breguet Question Mark
Adjusted: No Question Mark
Railroad Grade: No Question Mark
Movement Markings: New York
Standard Watch Co.
U.S.A.
7 Jewels
Case: Various Question Mark
Run ID: 247.95G1.16S46.M1.O91.P80.7J173 Question Mark
Database Version: v52.528 Question Mark
Advanced Metrics
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index:
Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
1,806.46 Question Mark
PWDB Relative Rarity Index:
Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
444.45 Question Mark
Share of Production:
Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
4.698% Question Mark
Registry Population:
Scoped for This Run Only
4 (0.00%) Question Mark

Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:

Does this information describe your movement accurately?

Verification Reports for this Run

The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.


Anonymous · November 26, 2024

Serial Number BD010822 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · October 15, 2024

Serial Number BD159306 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · July 29, 2024

Serial Number BD292653 was reported as accurate.

Anpavl Supporter 43 · June 12, 2024

Serial Number BD321564 was reported as accurate.

medhamred Supporter 145 · March 10, 2024

Serial Number BD082818 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 7, 2024

Serial Number BD320745 was reported as accurate.

Zoosolo 154 · February 4, 2024

Serial Number BD429529 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · February 2, 2024

Serial Number BD080691 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · January 2, 2024

Serial Number BD038009 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · December 5, 2023

Serial Number BD288778 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · December 5, 2023

Serial Number BD286073 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · November 24, 2023

Serial Number BD488236 was reported as accurate.

DocRogan43 Supporter 87 · November 23, 2023

Serial Number BD293876 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · October 30, 2023

Serial Number BD294635 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · September 18, 2023

Serial Number BD037759 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · August 26, 2023

Serial Number BD312596 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · June 28, 2023

Serial Number BD456990 was reported as accurate.

upsidedown05 8 · May 25, 2023

Serial Number BD290179 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 15, 2023

Serial Number BD365521 was reported as accurate.

cmould Supporter 192 · March 7, 2023

Serial Number BD287727 was reported as accurate.

mccullochjim Supporter 12 · February 6, 2023

Serial Number BD193875 was reported as accurate.

mccullochjim Supporter 12 · February 6, 2023

Serial Number BD193875 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · November 25, 2022

Serial Number BD189404 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · October 9, 2022

Serial Number BD338118 was reported as accurate.

LuftTigger Supporter 18 · September 18, 2022

Serial Number BD363397 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 19, 2022

Serial Number BD309328 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 19, 2022

Serial Number BD310225 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 18, 2022

Serial Number BD437044 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 18, 2022

Serial Number BD013386 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 18, 2022

Serial Number BD132615 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 18, 2022

Serial Number BD065132 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 17, 2022

Serial Number BD072366 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 17, 2022

Serial Number BD328343 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 17, 2022

Serial Number BD439547 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 17, 2022

Serial Number BD042981 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 17, 2022

Serial Number BD469309 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 17, 2022

Serial Number BD355295 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 16, 2022

Serial Number BD427559 was reported as accurate.

MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · August 16, 2022

Serial Number BD358225 was reported as accurate.

cbzimm Supporter 469 · August 15, 2022

Serial Number BD004503 was reported as accurate.

jason4kstate 271 · June 20, 2022

Serial Number BD385724 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · May 2, 2022

Serial Number BD002011 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · April 26, 2022

Serial Number BD415824 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · April 18, 2022

Serial Number BD027377 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Correct plate layout, but is a 15 Jewel movement,
with a "H" logo

Anonymous · March 13, 2022

Serial Number BD100615 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 7, 2022

Serial Number BD369537 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · February 10, 2022

Serial Number BD184101 was reported as accurate.

Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · December 20, 2021

Serial Number BD034132 was reported as accurate.

Cpmeadors Supporter 36 · December 5, 2021

Serial Number BD034132 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · November 18, 2021

Serial Number BD098501 was reported as accurate.

New York Standard Watch Co. Grade 95 Pocket Watch