Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/seth-thomas/2046859/auth/login
Access Date: May 09, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
Seth Thomas Watch Co.
Grade: Production Gap
Manufacturer: | Seth Thomas | |
Manufacturer Location: | Thomaston, Connecticut | |
Movement Serial Number: | 2046859 | |
Grade: | Production Gap | |
Variation: | Not Made | |
Estimated Production Year: | 1910 | |
Run Quantity: | 495,000 | |
Grade/Model Unrealized Production: | 2,565,480 | |
Case: | Various | |
Database Version: | v52.270 | |
Registry Population: | 10 (0.00%) |
Population Registry for This Run
Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are 10 watches in the population registry for this run.
|
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
SethThomasFan Top Contributor Seth Thomas Expert Supporter 305 · September 29, 2023
Serial Number 2046747 was reported as inaccurate.
Seth Thomas did not manufacture the "Dearborn
Special".
CechBro Supporter 35 · August 5, 2022
Serial Number 2046859 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 3, 2021
Serial Number 2479711 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 23, 2020
Serial Number 2155729 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 18, 2020
Serial Number 2357417 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 25, 2019
Serial Number 2384933 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 2, 2019
Serial Number 2449439 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 10, 2019
Serial Number 2196144 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 10, 2019
Serial Number 2196144 was reported as accurate.