Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/845
Access Date: February 18, 2025
"845" could possibly indicate the grade of the watch and not the serial number of your movement. Serial numbers are usually more than a few digits.
From the American Horology Archive:
American Waltham Watch Co.
Grade: Samuel Curtis
Manufacturer: | Waltham | ![]() |
Manufacturer Location: | Waltham, Massachusetts | ![]() |
Movement Serial Number: | 845 | ![]() |
Grade: | Samuel Curtis | ![]() |
Model: | Roxbury | ![]() |
Estimated Production Year: | 1853 | ![]() |
Run Quantity: | 1,000 | ![]() |
Grade/Model Run: | 1 of 1 | ![]() |
Grade/Model Total Production: | 1,000 | ![]() |
Size: | 18s | ![]() |
Movement Configuration: | Openface | ![]() |
Adjusted: | No | ![]() |
Railroad Grade: | No | ![]() |
Case: | Various | ![]() |
Run ID: | 1.G1.18S1.M1.O1.U1.J1 | ![]() |
Data Research: |
1954 Waltham "Gray Book" List NAWCC Waltham Serial Digest |
![]() |
Database Version: | v52.609 | ![]() |
Advanced Metrics | ||
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 3.01 | ![]() |
PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 2.74 | ![]() |
Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.003% | ![]() |
Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 58 (5.80%) | ![]() |
Population Registry for This Run
Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are 58 watches in the population registry for this run.
|
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Rick24 1 · July 7, 2021
Serial Number 597 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 1, 2020
Serial Number 289 was reported as inaccurate.
pmwas1 97 · November 28, 2020
Serial Number 549 was reported as accurate.
2mnyboxers Supporter 410 · September 9, 2020
Serial Number 331 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 10, 2020
Serial Number 645 was reported as inaccurate.
Jackdaniel 1 · March 25, 2020
Serial Number 610 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 11, 2020
Serial Number 1 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · January 12, 2020
Serial Number 836.788 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · December 16, 2019
Serial Number 218 was reported as inaccurate.