Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/17337348
Access Date: December 20, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
Elgin National Watch Co.
Grade: 372
B.W. Raymond, Gilt Hairspring
| Manufacturer: | Elgin |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Elgin, Illinois | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 17337348 | |
| Grade: | 372 | |
| Variation: | B.W. Raymond | |
| Model: | 15 | |
| Class: | 98 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1913 | |
| Run Quantity: | 1,000 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 21 of 36 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 35,700 | |
| Size: | 16s | |
| Jewels: | 19j | |
| Jewel Material: | Ruby & Sapphire | |
| Jewel Setting: | Gold Settings (Screw-Set) | |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Lever | |
| Plate: | 3/4 Plate | |
| Double Roller: | Yes | |
| Barrel: | Jeweled Safety | |
| Train: | Quick | |
| Regulator: | Traveling Nut (spring) | |
| Hairspring: | Breguet | |
| Standard Dial Type: | Double-Sunk | |
| Adjusted: | Yes | |
| Adjusted to Position: | Yes | |
| Adjusted # of Positions: | 5 | |
| Adjusted to Temperature: | Yes | |
| Adjusted to Isochronism: | Yes | |
| Railroad Grade: | Yes | |
| Railroad Grade Classification: | Class A | |
| Wind Indicator: | No | |
| U.S. Patents: | 77078, 596407, 596408 | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 8509.372G21.16S2021.1615M61.O3198.L2122.19J114 | |
| Data Research: |
1915 Elgin Serial List 1927/1950 Elgin Serial List |
|
| Database Version: | v52.516 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 107.48 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 41.48 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.071% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 12 (1.20%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | 3.64% Analyzing 273 Sales | |
|
Research Note: #17337747: Verified with Gilt Hairspring [NAWCC]
|
||
Production Metrics Tree: Grade 372
Target Profile: 16S-M15-19J-ONL-A5PTI-B.W. RAYMOND
| Elgin Grade 372 (All Variations): 35,700 ETP |
| 16S: 35,700 100.00% 16s, Grade 372 |
| 16S-M15: 35,700 100.00% 16s, Grade 372, Model 15 |
| 16S-M15-19J: 35,700 100.00% 16s, Grade 372, Model 15, 19 Jewels |
| 16S-M15-19J-ONL: 35,700 100.00% 16s, Grade 372, Model 15, 19 Jewels, Openface/Lever/Nickel |
| 16S-M15-19J-ONL-A5PTI: 35,700 100.00% |
| 16S-M15-19J-ONL-A5PTI-B.W. RAYMOND: 35,700 100.00% |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 12 watches in the population registry for this run with 1 image.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Anonymous · June 27, 2023
Serial Number 17337506 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 26, 2021
Serial Number 17337954 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 10, 2020
Serial Number 17337404 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 29, 2020
Serial Number 17337906 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 5, 2020
Serial Number 17337747 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 9, 2018
Serial Number 17337589 was reported as accurate.
sowthpaw44 Supporter 3 · March 16, 2017
Serial Number 17337200 was reported as inaccurate.
sowthpaw44 Supporter 3 · March 16, 2017
Serial Number 17337200 was reported as accurate.
Brycef 107 · August 3, 2016
Serial Number 17337805 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 28, 2014
Serial Number 17337667 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 25, 2014
Serial Number 17337667 was reported as accurate.
