Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/7258665/link
Access Date: December 03, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
Elgin National Watch Co.
Grade: 170
| Manufacturer: | Elgin |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Elgin, Illinois | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 7258665 | |
| Grade: | 170 | |
| Model: | 5 | |
| Class: | 10 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1898 | |
| Run Quantity: | 1,000 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 9 of 18 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 21,100 | |
| Size: | 18s | |
| Jewels: | 15j | |
| Jewel Setting: | Screw-Set | |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
| Movement Finish: | Half-Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
| Plate: | Full Plate | |
| Barrel: | Going | |
| Train: | Quick | |
| Regulator: | Moseley | |
| Hairspring: | Breguet | |
| Standard Dial Type: | Single-Sunk | |
| Adjusted: | No | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| U.S. Patents: | 77078, 347272, 345619 | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 2859.170G9.18S1565.185M462.O632.P1064.15J819 | |
| Data Research: |
1904 Elgin Serial List 1915 Elgin Serial List 1927/1950 Elgin Serial List |
|
| Database Version: | v52.479 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 63.52 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 24.49 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.042% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 9 (0.90%) | |
Production Metrics Tree: Grade 170
Target Profile: 18S-M5-15J-OHP-U
| Elgin Grade 170 (All Variations): 21,100 ETP |
| 18S: 21,100 100.00% 18s, Grade 170 |
| 18S-M5: 21,100 100.00% 18s, Grade 170, Model 5 |
| 18S-M5-15J: 21,100 100.00% 18s, Grade 170, Model 5, 15 Jewels |
| 18S-M5-15J-OHP: 21,100 100.00% 18s, Grade 170, Model 5, 15 Jewels, Openface/Pendant/Half-Nickel |
| 18S-M5-15J-OHP-U: 21,100 100.00% |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 9 watches in the population registry for this run with 2 images.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Rcardkidz 4083 · May 16, 2024
Serial Number 7258760 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 15, 2023
Serial Number 7258864 was reported as accurate.
Rickhufnagel7 Top Contributor Elgin Expert Hampden Expert Supporter 630 · January 15, 2022
Serial Number 7258665 was reported as accurate.
Rcardkidz 4083 · May 13, 2021
Serial Number 7258521 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 29, 2020
Serial Number 7258924 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 23, 2020
Serial Number 7258762 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 7, 2020
Serial Number 7258925 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 17, 2018
Serial Number 7258848 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 26, 2016
Serial Number 7258733 was reported as accurate.
Yellowtail420 Supporter 103 · June 2, 2015
Serial Number 7258411 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 17, 2015
Serial Number 7258289 was reported as accurate.
jerrydk7 227 · March 9, 2014
Serial Number 7258665 was reported as accurate.
Ripperg9 2 · July 21, 2013
Serial Number 7258417 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 11, 2012
Serial Number 7258468 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 11, 2012
Serial Number 7258468 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 11, 2012
Serial Number 7258468 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 30, 2012
Serial Number 7258665 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 15, 2012
Serial Number 7258595 was reported as accurate.
