Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/8773714
Access Date: April 07, 2025
From the American Horology Archive:
Elgin National Watch Co.
Grade: 223
| Manufacturer: | Elgin |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Elgin, Illinois | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 8773714 | |
| Grade: | 223 | |
| Model: | 1 | |
| Class: | 84 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1900 | |
| Run Quantity: | 6,000 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 6 of 17 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 44,000 | |
| Size: | 0s | |
| Jewels: | 15j | |
| Jewel Setting: | Screw-Set | |
| Movement Configuration: | Hunting | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
| Plate: | 3/4 Plate | |
| Barrel: | Going | |
| Train: | Quick | |
| Train Material: | Brass | |
| Center Wheel Material: | Gold | |
| Regulator: | Plain | |
| Hairspring: | Breguet | |
| Escapement Type: | Straight-line | |
| Adjusted: | No | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 3565.223G6.0S280.01M247.H2515.P1598.15J1002 | |
| Data Research: |
1904 Elgin Serial List 1915 Elgin Serial List 1927/1950 Elgin Serial List |
|
| Database Version: | v52.633 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 133.33 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 51.13 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.087% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 14 (0.23%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | 15.09% Analyzing 97 Sales | |
Production Metrics Tree: Grade 223
Target Profile: 0S-M1-15J-HNP-U
| Elgin Grade 223 (All Variations): 44,000 ETP |
| 0S: 44,000 100.00% 0s, Grade 223 |
| 0S-M1: 44,000 100.00% 0s, Grade 223, Model 1 |
| 0S-M1-15J: 44,000 100.00% 0s, Grade 223, Model 1, 15 Jewels |
| 0S-M1-15J-HNP: 44,000 100.00% 0s, Grade 223, Model 1, 15 Jewels, Hunting/Pendant/Nickel |
| 0S-M1-15J-HNP-U: 44,000 100.00% |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 14 watches in the population registry for this run with 1 image.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5348 · December 6, 2023
Serial Number 8777134 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 20, 2023
Serial Number 8772412 was reported as accurate.
cmdraven 4102 · December 7, 2021
Serial Number 8772847 was reported as accurate.
Fifty50 Supporter 350 · May 8, 2021
Serial Number 8774185 was reported as accurate.
Rickhufnagel7 Top Contributor Elgin Expert Hampden Expert Supporter 634 · October 9, 2019
Serial Number 8777103 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 12, 2019
Serial Number 8774109 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 9, 2018
Serial Number 8774136 was reported as accurate.
Brilla75 1 · June 9, 2018
Serial Number 8773899 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 2, 2018
Serial Number 8777103 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · November 14, 2017
Serial Number 8773694 was reported as accurate.
glaciersteel 6 · March 25, 2017
Serial Number 8773714 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 14, 2015
Serial Number 8772434 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 9, 2013
Serial Number 8776450 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 30, 2013
Serial Number 8773294 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 28, 2013
Serial Number 8774424 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 27, 2013
Serial Number 8776156 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 15, 2013
Serial Number 8777978 was reported as accurate.
