Pocket Watch Database


From the American Horology Archive:
Hamilton Grade 927 Pocket Watch

Hamilton Watch Co.

Grade: 927

Manufacturer: Hamilton Question Mark
Manufacturer Location: Lancaster, Pennsylvania Question Mark
Movement Serial Number: 660251 Question Mark
Grade: 927 Question Mark
Model: 2 Question Mark
Class: 3 Question Mark
Estimated Production Year: 1910 Question Mark
Run Quantity: 1,000 Question Mark
Grade/Model Run: 62 of 65 Question Mark
Grade/Model Total Production: 50,182 Question Mark
Size: 18s Question Mark
Jewels: 17j Question Mark
Jewel Setting: Screw-Set Question Mark
Movement Configuration: Hunting Question Mark
Movement Finish: Nickel Question Mark
Movement Setting: Lever Question Mark
Plate: Full Plate Question Mark
Regulator: Goldthwait Question Mark
Hairspring: Breguet Question Mark
Adjusted: Yes Question Mark
Adjusted to Position: No Question Mark
Adjusted to Temperature: Yes Question Mark
Adjusted to Isochronism: No Question Mark
Railroad Grade: No Question Mark
Dial Feet Locations: 2.6, 18.0, 38.2 Question Mark
Case: Various Question Mark
Run ID: 1096.927G62.18S645.182M240.H435.L722.17J664 Question Mark
Data Research: 1953 Hamilton Serial List
Question Mark
Database Version: v52.473 Question Mark
Advanced Metrics
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index:
Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
151.08 Question Mark
PWDB Relative Rarity Index:
Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
66.29 Question Mark
Share of Production:
Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
0.471% Question Mark
Registry Population:
Scoped for This Run Only
21 (2.10%) Question Mark
$ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): -1.49% Analyzing 393 Sales Question Mark
Research Note: #660696: Verified as Marked "925" on barrel bridge.

Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:

Does this information describe your movement accurately?

Verification Reports for this Run

The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.


Anonymous · December 10, 2023

Serial Number 660738 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: It’s a 925 with 925 on the center of the barrel
bridge

Anonymous · March 10, 2022

Serial Number 660696 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: This one is marked 925.
Curator Response: Thanks for the report. This information has been noted in the research notes for this run.

funkywatches 69 · March 9, 2022

Serial Number 660696 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · August 3, 2021

Serial Number 660596 was reported as accurate.

mehran Supporter 6 · June 12, 2020

Serial Number 660738 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: hi i use info on your site alot .thank you .on ths
pateqular movement on mine it sead 925
Curator Response: Thanks for the report. If possible, please upload an image of the movement to your collection for further evaluation and documentation.

Harlton Supporter 98 · January 27, 2020

Serial Number 660760 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · June 15, 2019

Serial Number 660698 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Watch is marked grade 925

Gimparoo Supporter 703 · March 10, 2019

Serial Number 660741 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · January 7, 2019

Serial Number 660557 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · December 18, 2018

Serial Number 660251 was reported as accurate.

okiejohn 387 · December 10, 2018

Serial Number 660251 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 9, 2017

Serial Number 660146 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 9, 2017

Serial Number 660146 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · November 1, 2016

Serial Number 660062 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · November 28, 2015

Serial Number 660206 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · November 18, 2015

Serial Number 660803 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · April 13, 2015

Serial Number 660954 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 21, 2015

Serial Number 660803 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · November 18, 2014

Serial Number 660546 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · July 20, 2014

Serial Number 660005 was reported as accurate.

69abody 166 · October 13, 2013

Serial Number 660846 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · May 3, 2013

Serial Number 660846 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: its a 925
Hamilton Grade 927 Pocket Watch