Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/hamilton/s26999
Access Date: November 08, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
Hamilton Watch Co.
Grade: 950B
Manufacturer: | Hamilton | |
Manufacturer Location: | Lancaster, Pennsylvania | |
Movement Serial Number: | s26999 | |
Grade: | 950B | |
Model: | 6 | |
Estimated Production Year: | 1962 | |
Run Quantity: | 2,000 | |
Grade/Model Run: | 16 of 19 | |
Grade/Model Total Production: | 32,700 | |
Size: | 16s | |
Jewels: | 23j | |
Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
Movement Setting: | Lever | |
Plate: | Bridge Plate | |
Bridge Type: | Center | |
Adjusted: | Yes | |
Adjusted to Position: | Yes | |
Adjusted # of Positions: | 6 | |
Adjusted to Temperature: | Yes | |
Adjusted to Isochronism: | Yes | |
Railroad Grade: | Yes | |
Dial Feet Locations: | 22.3, 38.0, 57.1
Hamilton 16s Dial Feet Research | |
Case: | Various | |
Run ID: | 2631.G16.16S1525.166M16.O1842.L1515.23J115 | |
Data Research: |
1953 Hamilton Serial List |
|
Database Version: | v52.428 | |
Advanced Metrics | ||
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 98.45 | |
PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 43.20 | |
Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.307% | |
Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 27 (1.35%) | |
$ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | 3.93% Analyzing 857 Sales |
Population Registry for This Run
Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are 27 watches in the population registry for this run with 5 images.
|
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · July 10, 2024
Serial Number S26538 was reported as accurate.
jrinconr 4 · December 1, 2023
Serial Number S27790 was reported as accurate.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · October 8, 2023
Serial Number S27989 was reported as accurate.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · August 13, 2023
Serial Number S26869 was reported as accurate.
Syncro91 Supporter 10 · January 15, 2023
Serial Number S27327 was reported as accurate.
10mueller 38 · November 13, 2021
Serial Number S27790 was reported as accurate.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · February 26, 2021
Serial Number S26427 was reported as accurate.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · January 19, 2021
Serial Number S27971 was reported as accurate.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · January 19, 2021
Serial Number S27971 was reported as accurate.
Miles2Go 1 · June 7, 2017
Serial Number S26378 was reported as inaccurate.
my grandfather (his father) prior to passing in
1961. My father believes his father purchased
this watch in or around 1935, possibly earlier in
the twenties. How could the database reflect a
production date of 1962?
Miles2Go 1 · June 7, 2017
Serial Number S26378 was reported as accurate.
slallen65 7 · March 24, 2016
Serial Number S27241 was reported as accurate.
Gasperoff Supporter 727 · November 15, 2015
Serial Number S27423 was reported as accurate.
Gasperoff Supporter 727 · November 14, 2015
Serial Number S27423 was reported as accurate.
Gasperoff Supporter 727 · November 9, 2015
Serial Number S27423 was reported as accurate.
beaudiki1 10 · August 18, 2015
Serial Number S26959 was reported as accurate.
alandye 52 · May 14, 2015
Serial Number S27397 was reported as accurate.
Gasperoff Supporter 727 · April 29, 2015
Serial Number S27681 was reported as accurate.
Gasperoff Supporter 727 · March 28, 2015
Serial Number S27065 was reported as accurate.
bcantrel1962 19 · February 20, 2015
Serial Number S27126 was reported as accurate.
-
From This Run
uploaded by radisapet
-
From This Run
uploaded by goldslinger
-
From This Run
uploaded by Syncro91
-
From This Run
uploaded by Miles2Go
-
From This Run
uploaded by jrinconr
-
uploaded by goldslinger
-
uploaded by eparso
-
uploaded by slufdriver
-
uploaded by rgvbgrgvbg