Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/hampden/2715573
Access Date: November 21, 2024
Due to the lack of existing factory records, our Hampden Watch Co. database has been reconstructed using observations of known watches.
As a result, the information may contain inaccuracies. Please let us know if you have details that can improve the database.
From the American Horology Archive:
Hampden Watch Co.
Grade: No. 440
Manufacturer: | Hampden | |
Manufacturer Location: | Canton, Ohio | |
Movement Serial Number: | 2715573 | |
Grade: | No. 440 | |
Model: | 4 | |
Estimated Production Year: | 1910 | |
Size: | 16s | |
Jewels: | 15j | |
Movement Configuration: | Hunting | |
Movement Finish: | Two-Tone | |
Movement Setting: | Lever | |
Plate: | Bridge Plate | |
Regulator: | Hampden Star | |
Adjusted: | No | |
Railroad Grade: | No | |
Dial Feet Locations: | 24.5, 37.52, 58 | |
Case: | Various | |
Database Version: | v52.450 | |
Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 4 (1.34%) | |
$ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | -10.78% Analyzing 53 Sales |
Population Registry for This Run
Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are 4 watches in the population registry for this run with 1 image.
|
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
dwatson Supporter 7 · May 25, 2023
Serial Number 2715573 was reported as inaccurate.
movement photo.
Anonymous · July 15, 2014
Serial Number 2715605 was reported as accurate.
KenKLG 26 · September 30, 2013
Serial Number 2715848 was reported as inaccurate.
it is not a Dueber