Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/hampden/3159569
Access Date: April 18, 2024
Due to the lack of existing factory records, our Hampden Watch Co. database has been reconstructed using observations of known watches.
As a result, the information may contain inaccuracies. Please let us know if you have details that can improve the database.
From the American Horology Archive:
Hampden Watch Co.
Grade: No. 99
| Manufacturer: | Hampden |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Canton, Ohio | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 3159569 | |
| Grade: | No. 99 | |
| Model: | 5 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1913 | |
| Size: | 16s | |
| Jewels: | 15j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Hunting | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Lever or Pendant | |
| Plate: | Bridge Plate | |
| Regulator: | Patent | |
| Adjusted: | No | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| Dial Feet Locations: | 24.5, 37.52, 58 | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Database Version: | v52.235 | |
| Registry Population: | 5 (0.50%) | |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 5 watches in the population registry for this run with 1 image.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
ChrisG Top Contributor Supporter 543 · February 9, 2023
Serial Number 3159752 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 19, 2019
Serial Number 3159549 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 13, 2018
Serial Number 3159133 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 28, 2013
Serial Number 3159144 was reported as inaccurate.
