Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/rockford/1095/movement
Access Date: November 27, 2024
"1095" could possibly indicate the grade of the watch and not the serial number of your movement. Serial numbers are usually more than a few digits.
From the American Horology Archive:
Rockford Watch Co.
Grade: 9 Jewels
Original data is missing for this range. Please report information about your watch movement, if known.
| Manufacturer: | Rockford |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Rockford, Illinois | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 1095 | |
| Grade: | 9 Jewels | |
| Model: | 1 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1876 | |
| Size: | 18s | |
| Jewels: | 9j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Adaptable | |
| Movement Finish: | Gilt | |
| Movement Setting: | Key | |
| Plate: | Full Plate | |
| Regulator: | Plain | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Data Research: |
1907 Rockford Serial List |
|
| Database Version: | v52.465 | |
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Anonymous · September 16, 2024
Serial Number 1174 was reported as accurate.
23Greenwich Supporter 252 · August 15, 2024
Serial Number 1538 was reported as accurate.
Pinko423 9 · October 17, 2023
Serial Number 1460 was reported as accurate.
Pinko423 9 · October 13, 2023
Serial Number 1640 was reported as accurate.
Rockfordguy Supporter 46 · July 7, 2023
Serial Number 1107 was reported as inaccurate.
cbzimm Supporter 469 · April 20, 2022
Serial Number 1785 was reported as accurate.
Pinko2 69 · February 26, 2022
Serial Number 1640 was reported as accurate.
Pinko2 69 · February 26, 2022
Serial Number 1640 was reported as accurate.
Pinko2 69 · February 26, 2022
Serial Number 1640 was reported as accurate.
Pinko2 69 · February 26, 2022
Serial Number 1640 was reported as accurate.
Pinko2 69 · December 26, 2021
Serial Number 1640 was reported as accurate.
Pinko2 69 · December 25, 2021
Serial Number 1460 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 25, 2021
Serial Number 1785 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 3, 2020
Serial Number 1451 was reported as inaccurate.
beelzebud 6 · February 6, 2020
Serial Number 1110 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 19, 2018
Serial Number 1381 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · October 5, 2017
Serial Number 1381 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 14, 2017
Serial Number 1128 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 5, 2014
Serial Number 1483 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 22, 2014
Serial Number 1128 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · September 9, 2014
Serial Number 1128 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 3, 2014
Serial Number 1128 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 2, 2014
Serial Number 1598 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 29, 2014
Serial Number 1598 was reported as accurate.
worldofantiques 199 · January 24, 2014
Serial Number 1598 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 7, 2013
Serial Number 1110 was reported as inaccurate.
(2 screws per) not marked adjusted
-
This WatchFrom This Runuploaded by Rockfordguy
-
From This Runuploaded by 1dueberincanton
-
From This Runuploaded by Rockfordguy
-
From This Runuploaded by fabianmwb
-
From This Runuploaded by mbellich
-
From This Runuploaded by cbzimm
-
uploaded by Rockfordguy
-
uploaded by TimeAntiquarian
-
uploaded by beelzebud
-
uploaded by wmike565