Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/rockford/4810/movement
Access Date: November 23, 2024
"4810" could possibly indicate the grade of the watch and not the serial number of your movement. Serial numbers are usually more than a few digits.
From the American Horology Archive:
Rockford Watch Co.
Grade: 9 Jewels
Original data is missing for this range. Please report information about your watch movement, if known.
| Manufacturer: | Rockford |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Rockford, Illinois | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 4810 | |
| Grade: | 9 Jewels | |
| Model: | 1 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1877 | |
| Size: | 18s | |
| Jewels: | 9j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Adaptable | |
| Movement Finish: | Gilt | |
| Movement Setting: | Transition | |
| Plate: | Full Plate | |
| Regulator: | Plain | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Data Research: |
1907 Rockford Serial List |
|
| Database Version: | v52.452 | |
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
mbricker 2 · May 10, 2024
Serial Number 4631 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 10, 2024
Serial Number 4631 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 7, 2023
Serial Number 4268 was reported as accurate.
23Greenwich Supporter 249 · June 30, 2022
Serial Number 4566 was reported as accurate.
Bostonjoe Top Contributor Supporter 196 · January 29, 2022
Serial Number 4509 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 9, 2021
Serial Number 4447 was reported as inaccurate.
movement, with this serial number, is engraved as
having 11 jewels, not nine.
Anonymous · December 24, 2020
Serial Number 4942 was reported as inaccurate.
Jewel, Extra. This should be from 1877, second
year of production.
Anonymous · May 2, 2020
Serial Number 4527 was reported as accurate.
wmike565 Supporter 115 · September 13, 2018
Serial Number 4254 was reported as inaccurate.
Picture is provided
beelzebud 6 · September 3, 2018
Serial Number 4810 was reported as inaccurate.
bridge
Anonymous · June 28, 2018
Serial Number 4527 was reported as inaccurate.
beelzebud 6 · June 18, 2018
Serial Number 4107 was reported as inaccurate.
Crown at 3pm
Anonymous · January 25, 2018
Serial Number 4058 was reported as inaccurate.
beelzebud 6 · January 19, 2018
Serial Number 4125 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · September 26, 2017
Serial Number 4564 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 24, 2016
Serial Number 4058 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · January 9, 2016
Serial Number 4941 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 27, 2014
Serial Number 4667 was reported as accurate.
tomc1234 31 · January 11, 2014
Serial Number 4268 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 9, 2013
Serial Number 4263 was reported as inaccurate.
tomc1234 31 · September 3, 2013
Serial Number 4268 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 26, 2013
Serial Number 4874 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · April 26, 2013
Serial Number 4862 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · April 26, 2013
Serial Number 4862 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · March 7, 2013
Serial Number 4125 was reported as inaccurate.
private label: Thomas C Calvert
not RR grade
-
This WatchFrom This Runuploaded by beelzebud
-
From This Runuploaded by Suppo32
-
From This Runuploaded by mbricker
-
From This Runuploaded by Rockfordguy
-
From This Runuploaded by Bostonjoe
-
From This Runuploaded by wmike565
-
From This Runuploaded by beelzebud
-
uploaded by cbzimm
-
uploaded by mbellich
-
uploaded by fabianmwb