Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/10091344/link
Access Date: November 09, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
American Waltham Watch Co.
Grade: Vanguard
Mixed Run: 21-Jewel and 23-Jewel Examples Reported. #10090973: Reported as marked "21 Jewels."
| Manufacturer: | Waltham |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Waltham, Massachusetts | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 10091344 | |
| Grade: | Vanguard | |
| Model: | 1892 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1900 | |
| Run Quantity: | 1,000 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 51 of 191 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 101,864 | |
| Size: | 18s | |
| Jewels: | 23j Mixed Run | |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Lever | |
| Plate: | Full Plate | |
| Regulator: | Church 1892 | |
| Hairspring: | Breguet | |
| Adjusted: | Yes | |
| Adjusted to Position: | Yes | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 16828.G54.18S10443.181892M169.O10833.L4308.23J10 | |
| Data Research: |
1954 Waltham "Gray Book" List NAWCC Waltham Serial Digest |
|
| Database Version: | v52.431 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 245.84 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 223.71 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.244% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 14 (1.40%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | 2.29% Analyzing 383 Sales | |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 14 watches in the population registry for this run with 1 image.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
JointVenture Supporter 130 · May 24, 2023
Serial Number 10090541 was reported as accurate.
okwatch 27 · October 11, 2021
Serial Number 10090973 was reported as inaccurate.
Movement is marked "21 Ruby Jewels"
Anonymous · July 11, 2021
Serial Number 10090990 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 20, 2019
Serial Number 10090698 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · July 6, 2019
Serial Number 10091152 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 26, 2017
Serial Number 10091205 was reported as accurate.
chuck1500 112 · August 31, 2017
Serial Number 10091344 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · June 5, 2017
Serial Number 10091349 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 18, 2017
Serial Number 10091419 was reported as accurate.
deancaselli 1 · April 12, 2017
Serial Number 10091167 was reported as inaccurate.
additional information the case is stamped on the
edge that is covered by the screw on back with the
number '06851269' (this number starts just at the
6pm position). And the inside back cover is
stamped with 'Warranted B&B Royal 20 Years
6851269'. This watch was my Great Grandfathers
and he lived his entire life in Bucks County,
Pennsylvania.
Anonymous · March 31, 2017
Serial Number 10091354 was reported as accurate.
dnburkhardt 8 · September 2, 2016
Serial Number 10090874 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · July 31, 2016
Serial Number 10091351 was reported as accurate.
JackStraw 6 · September 21, 2014
Serial Number 10090647 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · January 21, 2014
Serial Number 10091290 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · November 25, 2013
Serial Number 10091325 was reported as inaccurate.
jewels " but your table says 23j "
Anonymous · April 10, 2013
Serial Number 10091309 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 10, 2013
Serial Number 10091309 was reported as inaccurate.
-
From This Runuploaded by okwatch
-
uploaded by abjamesjd
-
uploaded by jrobinson777
-
uploaded by Jason410
-
uploaded by Snapper
-
uploaded by strikeph
-
uploaded by ComunaleHoard
-
uploaded by DisprBJR
-
uploaded by nicnic
-
uploaded by 01somws6