Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/28038614/movement
Access Date: November 22, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
American Waltham Watch Co.
Grade: No. 210
Mixed Run: 7-Jewel and 9-Jewel Movements
Manufacturer: | Waltham | |
Manufacturer Location: | Waltham, Massachusetts | |
Movement Serial Number: | 28038614 | |
Grade: | No. 210 | |
Model: | 1894 | |
Estimated Production Year: | 1934 | |
Run Quantity: | 20,000 | |
Grade/Model Run: | 432 of 432 | |
Grade/Model Total Production: | 1,449,299 | |
Size: | 12s | |
Jewels: | 7j Mixed Run | |
Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
Plate: | 3/4 Plate | |
Hairspring: | Breguet | |
Adjusted: | No | |
Railroad Grade: | No | |
Case: | Various | |
Run ID: | 25510.G432.12S1691.121894M1620.O15814.P10441.7J7570 | |
Data Research: |
1954 Waltham "Gray Book" List NAWCC Waltham Serial Digest |
|
Database Version: | v52.450 | |
Advanced Metrics | ||
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 3,328.56 | |
PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 3,028.98 | |
Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 3.309% | |
Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 45 (0.23%) | |
$ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | 10.29% Analyzing 1,652 Sales | |
Research Note: Waltham Serial Lists designate this run as Grade "No. 210" with 7 Jewels. However, movements have been observed in the run marked "Nine Jewels." Based on reports, movements earlier in the run appear to be fitted with 7 jewels while later movements contain 9 jewels.
|
Population Registry for This Run
Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are 45 watches in the population registry for this run with 4 images.
|
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Anonymous · February 18, 2023
Serial Number 28040639 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · February 7, 2022
Serial Number 28034595 was reported as inaccurate.
It is in a deck box.
thanks, Lehr
Amondine1979 1 · July 6, 2021
Serial Number 28043381 was reported as accurate.
cmdraven 4083 · July 21, 2020
Serial Number 28041520 was reported as accurate.
cmdraven 4083 · January 8, 2020
Serial Number 28036117 was reported as accurate.
Nhouse 1 · December 29, 2019
Serial Number 28034546 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · April 13, 2019
Serial Number 28032318 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · February 10, 2019
Serial Number 28044491 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 19, 2018
Serial Number 28035103 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · October 9, 2018
Serial Number 28032318 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · August 13, 2018
Serial Number 28044429 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 10, 2018
Serial Number 28040537 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 21, 2017
Serial Number 28035407 was reported as accurate.
Otherdog 11 · May 7, 2017
Serial Number 28032546 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 7, 2017
Serial Number 28032546 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 23, 2016
Serial Number 28029696 was reported as accurate.
PJS0195 1 · November 14, 2015
Serial Number 28043519 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 5, 2015
Serial Number 28041449 was reported as inaccurate.
ekeko1 19 · June 6, 2015
Serial Number 28034777 was reported as accurate.
Private 1 · February 18, 2015
Serial Number 28036628 was reported as inaccurate.
backcase says wadsworth quality 6931399. I don't
think this has been tampered with as the design on
the front and the design on the back case are the
same so it looks like the case was made by a
different company at Waltham's request.
-
This WatchFrom This Run
uploaded by gdhellas1
-
From This Run
uploaded by rfarver
-
From This Run
uploaded by geographergil
-
From This Run
uploaded by WinterHawk62
-
uploaded by dgosney
-
uploaded by 1whatever
-
uploaded by Scottydoesntknow
-
uploaded by Rache125
-
uploaded by AIexander
-
uploaded by tomkingtx