Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/3186860
Access Date: November 19, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
American Waltham Watch Co.
Grade: No. 25
| Manufacturer: | Waltham |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Waltham, Massachusetts | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 3186860 | |
| Grade: | No. 25 | |
| Variation: | W.W.Co. Quality | |
| Model: | 1883 | |
| Estimated Production Date: | May 1887 - October 1887 | |
| Run Quantity: | 1,000 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 10 of 89 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 65,100 | |
| Size: | 18s | |
| Jewels: | 15j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
| Plate: | Full Plate | |
| Regulator: | Church 1885 | |
| Hairspring: | Breguet | |
| Adjusted: | Yes | |
| Adjusted # of Positions: | 3 | |
| Adjusted to Temperature: | Yes | |
| Adjusted to Isochronism: | Yes | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 12185.G12.18S8284.181883M193.O8610.P114.15J2655 | |
| Data Research: |
c.1900 Waltham Factory Ledger Book 2 [NAWCC] 1954 Waltham "Gray Book" List NAWCC Waltham Serial Digest |
|
| Database Version: | v52.445 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 101.16 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 92.05 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.101% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 17 (1.70%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | -5.97% Analyzing 289 Sales | |
|
Research Note: In 1894, Waltham added 2 center jewels to the remaining inventory, modifying the movements from 15j to 17j. All 17j movements are marked as such.
|
||
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 17 watches in the population registry for this run with 2 images.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Fifty50 Supporter 350 · July 7, 2024
Serial Number 3186687 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 17, 2020
Serial Number 3186545 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 23, 2020
Serial Number 3186545 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 21, 2019
Serial Number 3186567 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 27, 2019
Serial Number 3186567 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 14, 2019
Serial Number 3186185 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 23, 2018
Serial Number 3186059 was reported as accurate.
Acme69runner 24 · January 24, 2018
Serial Number 3186899 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 6, 2017
Serial Number 3186545 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 27, 2015
Serial Number 3186545 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 2, 2015
Serial Number 3186545 was reported as accurate.
daddo46 992 · April 7, 2015
Serial Number 3186341 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 2, 2015
Serial Number 3186926 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 4, 2014
Serial Number 3186899 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 20, 2014
Serial Number 3186472 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 19, 2014
Serial Number 3186040 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 4, 2014
Serial Number 3186040 was reported as accurate.
lukeduke077 2 · July 4, 2014
Serial Number 3186837 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 9, 2013
Serial Number 3186970 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · January 15, 2013
Serial Number 3186899 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 15, 2013
Serial Number 3186899 was reported as accurate.
