Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/466074
Access Date: April 28, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
American Waltham Watch Co.
Grade: P.S. Bartlett
| Manufacturer: | Waltham |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Waltham, Massachusetts | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 466074 | |
| Grade: | P.S. Bartlett | |
| Model: | 1857 | |
| Estimated Production Date: | June 1870 - September 1, 1870 | |
| Run Quantity: | 2,000 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 2534 of 2837 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 293,359 | |
| Size: | 18s | |
| Jewels: | 11j | |
| Jewel Material: | Ruby | |
| Movement Configuration: | Adaptable | |
| Movement Finish: | Gilt | |
| Movement Setting: | Key | |
| Plate: | Full Plate | |
| Adjusted: | No | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| Data Research: |
c.1900 Waltham Factory Ledger Book 1 [NAWCC] c.1900 Waltham Factory Ledgers [Ehrhardt Transcription] 1954 Waltham "Gray Book" List NAWCC Waltham Serial Digest |
|
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 4648.G2699.18S4328.181857M4125.O4638.K4641.11J2742 | |
| Database Version: | v52.245 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 842.18 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 766.39 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.837% | |
| Registry Population: | 12 (0.60%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | -8.51% Analyzing 1,038 Sales | |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 12 watches in the population registry for this run with 1 image.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
cmould Supporter 192 · March 5, 2023
Serial Number 466074 was reported as accurate.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 4700 · July 26, 2022
Serial Number 465509 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 14, 2020
Serial Number 465528 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 26, 2020
Serial Number 465280 was reported as inaccurate.
the date with the movement removed from the case.
Anonymous · July 7, 2019
Serial Number 466474 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 14, 2019
Serial Number 466042 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 31, 2019
Serial Number 465967 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 27, 2018
Serial Number 466042 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 1, 2018
Serial Number 466939 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 22, 2018
Serial Number 466768 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 31, 2018
Serial Number 466768 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 17, 2018
Serial Number 466768 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 23, 2017
Serial Number 465690 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 3, 2016
Serial Number 465513 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 23, 2016
Serial Number 465218 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 4, 2015
Serial Number 465513 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 24, 2015
Serial Number 466176 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 6, 2015
Serial Number 466464 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 6, 2015
Serial Number 465562 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 28, 2015
Serial Number 466464 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 24, 2015
Serial Number 466464 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 16, 2013
Serial Number 465688 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 9, 2013
Serial Number 465668 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 12, 2013
Serial Number 466340 was reported as accurate.
