Pocket Watch Database


From the American Horology Archive:
Waltham Grade W.W.Co. Pocket Watch

American Waltham Watch Co.

Grade: W.W.Co.

Manufacturer: Waltham Question Mark
Manufacturer Location: Waltham, Massachusetts Question Mark
Movement Serial Number: 639826 Question Mark
Grade: W.W.Co. Question Mark
Model: 1857 Question Mark
Estimated Production Date: August 1872 - December 1, 1872 Question Mark
Run Quantity: 2,000 Question Mark
Grade/Model Run: 157 of 238 Question Mark
Grade/Model Total Production: 61,722 Question Mark
Size: 18s Question Mark
Jewels: 15j Question Mark
Movement Configuration: Adaptable Question Mark
Movement Finish: Gilt Question Mark
Movement Setting: Key Question Mark
Plate: Full Plate Question Mark
Balance Type: Expansion Question Mark
Adjusted: Yes Question Mark
Adjusted to Position: Yes Question Mark
Case: Various Question Mark
Run ID: 5164.G157.18S4718.181857M4500.O5133.K5150.15J1241 Question Mark
Data Research: c.1900 Waltham Factory Ledger Book 1 [NAWCC]
c.1900 Waltham Factory Ledgers [Ehrhardt Transcription]
1954 Waltham "Gray Book" List
NAWCC Waltham Serial Digest
Question Mark
Database Version: v52.428 Question Mark
Advanced Metrics
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index:
Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
157.67 Question Mark
PWDB Relative Rarity Index:
Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
143.48 Question Mark
Share of Production:
Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
0.157% Question Mark
Registry Population:
Scoped for This Run Only
25 (1.25%) Question Mark
$ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): 5.80% Analyzing 320 Sales Question Mark

Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:

Does this information describe your movement accurately?

Verification Reports for this Run

The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.


Anonymous · November 22, 2023

Serial Number 640029 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · April 1, 2023

Serial Number 640993 was reported as inaccurate.

No further details were submitted with the report.

taborclock Supporter 148 · January 5, 2023

Serial Number 640611 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · May 12, 2022

Serial Number 639776 was reported as accurate.

Bostonjoe Top Contributor Supporter 196 · December 11, 2021

Serial Number 639097 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · October 23, 2021

Serial Number 640923 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · October 21, 2021

Serial Number 640923 was reported as accurate.

bubba70 543 · August 8, 2021

Serial Number 640943 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · August 16, 2020

Serial Number 639713 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · November 26, 2019

Serial Number 639958 was reported as accurate.

Watch101 1 · October 30, 2019

Serial Number 639285 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · September 5, 2019

Serial Number 639159 was reported as inaccurate.

No further details were submitted with the report.

barberr1 67 · April 29, 2019

Serial Number 640941 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · April 5, 2019

Serial Number 640079 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · August 9, 2018

Serial Number 640615 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 6, 2018

Serial Number 639671 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: 9 jewels
Changes since this report was submitted:
Jewels changed from 17j to 15j

Thatcher 1 · May 15, 2017

Serial Number 639285 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Jewels changed from 17j to 15j

Anonymous · December 25, 2016

Serial Number 640284 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Jewels changed from 17j to 15j

Anonymous · October 30, 2016

Serial Number 640487 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Jewels changed from 17j to 15j

Anonymous · September 4, 2016

Serial Number 639826 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Jewels changed from 17j to 15j

Anonymous · August 2, 2016

Serial Number 640442 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Jewels changed from 17j to 15j

Anonymous · August 2, 2016

Serial Number 640448 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Jewels changed from 17j to 15j

Anonymous · April 10, 2016

Serial Number 639713 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Hunter case and Waltham Watch Co. on movement,
not just the initials.
Changes since this report was submitted:
Jewels changed from 17j to 15j

sanjosetom 313 · March 2, 2016

Serial Number 639119 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Jewels changed from 17j to 15j

VH1943 176 · January 28, 2016

Serial Number 639584 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Jewels changed from 17j to 15j

Anonymous · November 10, 2015

Serial Number 639097 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Movement is marked 17 jewels, otherwise data is
accurate

Anonymous · August 21, 2015

Serial Number 640995 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · February 22, 2015

Serial Number 639823 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · December 26, 2014

Serial Number 640043 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · April 13, 2014

Serial Number 639164 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · December 23, 2012

Serial Number 640872 was reported as accurate.

Waltham Grade W.W.Co. Pocket Watch