Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/6500683/link
Access Date: December 22, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
American Waltham Watch Co.
Grade: American Watch Co.
Mixed Run: 17-Jewel, 19-Jewel, and 21-Jewel Movements
Manufacturer: | Waltham | |
Manufacturer Location: | Waltham, Massachusetts | |
Movement Serial Number: | 6500683 | |
Grade: | American Watch Co. | |
Model: | 1888 | |
Estimated Production Date: | April 1893 - May 1899 | |
Run Quantity: | 330 | |
Grade/Model Run: | 17 of 26 | |
Grade/Model Total Production: | 2,981 | |
Size: | 16s | |
Jewels: | 19j Mixed Run | |
Movement Configuration: | Hunting | |
Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
Plate: | 3/4 Plate | |
Regulator: | Patent | |
Hairspring: | Breguet | |
Adjusted: | Yes | |
Adjusted to Position: | Yes | |
Case: | Various | |
Run ID: | 14708.G70.16S612.161888M286.H3991.P1393.19J46 | |
Data Research: |
c.1900 Waltham Factory Ledger Book 2 [NAWCC] 1954 Waltham "Gray Book" List NAWCC Waltham Serial Digest |
|
Database Version: | v52.518 | |
Advanced Metrics | ||
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 2.32 | |
PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 2.11 | |
Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.002% | |
Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 12 (3.64%) |
Population Registry for This Run
Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are 12 watches in the population registry for this run.
|
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Anonymous · October 28, 2021
Serial Number 6500748 was reported as inaccurate.
A W Co version.
JerryT Waltham Expert Small Watch Expert 425 · August 17, 2021
Serial Number 6500677 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 31, 2020
Serial Number 6500704 was reported as inaccurate.
information is accurate, but I was hoping to gain
information.
Thank you so much for this valuable service!!
I am the proud owner of five American grade
model 1888s. #6500347, 6500407,6500704, 6500760
and #6500451. My question for you is: how can I
tell a 17 jewel from a 21 jewel without
disassembly? They all look the same (and I would
like to add they are all beautiful!) from
examination of the top plate. They also look
identical to the four Riverside Maximus model
1888 21jewel watches I own (except, of course, for
the movement markings and diamonds rather than
rubies). Thank you!!
Anonymous · May 1, 2018
Serial Number 6500821 was reported as inaccurate.
pocket watch which is 21 jewels. It is stem wound
and stem sei. It appears to have a solid gold
gear train. Its jewels are raised goled and held
in with screws. It also has very fancy
damaskeening on the plates, winding wheels and
more.
Watchgramps 6 · January 22, 2018
Serial Number 6500704 was reported as accurate.
Watchgramps 6 · January 14, 2018
Serial Number 6500704 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 8, 2017
Serial Number 6500760 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · December 2, 2017
Serial Number 6500760 was reported as accurate.
Pocketwatchlover 71 · October 7, 2016
Serial Number 6500558 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · September 21, 2015
Serial Number 6500760 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 19, 2015
Serial Number 6500611 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 24, 2015
Serial Number 6500525 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 30, 2014
Serial Number 6500705 was reported as accurate.
spadelt 11 · October 5, 2014
Serial Number 6500594 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 10, 2014
Serial Number 6500594 was reported as inaccurate.
BoVigoren 10 · September 13, 2013
Serial Number 6500760 was reported as accurate.
-
uploaded by DDC1967
-
uploaded by tctimepieces
-
uploaded by Abidiaz
-
Image Source/Credit: eBay Auction
-
uploaded by DTSPatrick
-
uploaded by Rickglick1
-
uploaded by kumabull
-
uploaded by DTSPatrick