Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/6516222
Access Date: December 27, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
American Waltham Watch Co.
Grade: Riverside
| Manufacturer: | Waltham |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Waltham, Massachusetts | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 6516222 | |
| Grade: | Riverside | |
| Model: | 1888 | |
| Estimated Production Date: | October 1894 - August 1895 | |
| Run Quantity: | 1,020 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 72 of 115 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 57,859 | |
| Size: | 16s | |
| Jewels: | 15j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Pendant | |
| Plate: | 3/4 Plate | |
| Regulator: | Patent | |
| Hairspring: | Breguet | |
| Adjusted: | Yes | |
| Adjusted to Position: | Yes | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 14752.G544.16S639.161888M313.O9807.P1422.15J3529 | |
| Data Research: |
c.1900 Waltham Factory Ledger Book 2 [NAWCC] 1954 Waltham "Gray Book" List NAWCC Waltham Serial Digest |
|
| Database Version: | v52.528 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 96.33 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 87.66 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.096% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 8 (0.78%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | 3.36% Analyzing 109 Sales | |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 8 watches in the population registry for this run with 1 image.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Anonymous · September 13, 2024
Serial Number 6516457 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 23, 2024
Serial Number 6516457 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 15, 2021
Serial Number 6516550 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 8, 2021
Serial Number 6516020 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · February 12, 2021
Serial Number 6516978 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 13, 2021
Serial Number 6516550 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 14, 2020
Serial Number 6516425 was reported as accurate.
railroader 2 · August 22, 2019
Serial Number 6516115 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 15, 2018
Serial Number 6516914 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 29, 2018
Serial Number 6516222 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 26, 2018
Serial Number 6516654 was reported as accurate.
dfchong 837 · December 26, 2017
Serial Number 6516115 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 24, 2016
Serial Number 6516934 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 24, 2016
Serial Number 6516954 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 23, 2016
Serial Number 6516871 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 25, 2016
Serial Number 6516644 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 13, 2016
Serial Number 6516732 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 2, 2015
Serial Number 6516161 was reported as inaccurate.
stem set not key. It had a nickel damaskeened
movement.
Anonymous · February 20, 2015
Serial Number 6516584 was reported as inaccurate.
pendant set, NOT key setting. Finish is
damaskeened nickel
Anonymous · February 20, 2015
Serial Number 6516584 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 15, 2013
Serial Number 6516011 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 10, 2013
Serial Number 6516011 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 9, 2013
Serial Number 6516011 was reported as accurate.
