Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/3890/link
Access Date: November 08, 2024
"3890" could possibly indicate the grade of the watch and not the serial number of your movement. Serial numbers are usually more than a few digits.
From the American Horology Archive:
Elgin National Watch Co.
Grade: 62
H.Z. Culver
| Manufacturer: | Elgin |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Elgin, Illinois | |
| Movement Serial Number: | 3890 | |
| Grade: | 62 | |
| Variation: | H.Z. Culver | |
| Model: | 1 | |
| Class: | 2 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1867 | |
| Run Quantity: | 1,800 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 2 of 17 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 16,146 | |
| Variant Est. Production: | 5,646 (18S-M1-15J-HGK-U) | |
| Size: | 18s | |
| Jewels: | 15j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Adaptable | |
| Movement Finish: | Gilt | |
| Movement Setting: | Key | |
| Plate: | Full Plate | |
| Barrel: | Going | |
| Train: | Quick | |
| Regulator: | Plain | |
| Adjusted: | No | |
| Railroad Grade: | No | |
| U.S. Patents: | 77078 | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 5.62G2.18S4.181M4.H4.K4.15J4 | |
| Data Research: |
1896 Elgin Serial List 1904 Elgin Serial List 1915 Elgin Serial List 1927/1950 Elgin Serial List |
|
| Database Version: | v52.428 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 48.61 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 18.73 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.032% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 20 (1.11%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | -7.43% Analyzing 120 Sales | |
Production Metrics Tree: Grade 62
Target Profile: 18S-M1-15J-HGK-U-H.Z. CULVER
| Elgin Grade 62 (All Variations): 16,146 ETP | |
| 18S: 16,146 100.00% 18s, Grade 62 |
|
| 18S-M1: 16,146 100.00% 18s, Grade 62, Model 1 |
|
| 18S-M1-15J: 16,146 100.00% 18s, Grade 62, Model 1, 15 Jewels |
|
| 18S-M1-15J-HGK: 16,146 100.00% 18s, Grade 62, Model 1, 15 Jewels, Adaptable/Key/Gilt |
|
| 18S-M1-15J-HGK-U: 5,646 34.97% | Other: 10,500
Other Adjustments or Unclassified |
| 18S-M1-15J-HGK-U-H.Z. CULVER: 5,646 34.97% | |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 20 watches in the population registry for this run with 4 images.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Anonymous · April 23, 2024
Serial Number 2788 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 10, 2022
Serial Number 3904 was reported as accurate.
Bostonjoe Top Contributor Supporter 196 · September 5, 2022
Serial Number 2225 was reported as accurate.
vette69 Supporter 1 · June 2, 2022
Serial Number 2235 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 5, 2022
Serial Number 3904 was reported as accurate.
Jay1962 Supporter 2 · June 20, 2021
Serial Number 3574 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 14, 2021
Serial Number 3674 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 24, 2021
Serial Number 3828 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 28, 2021
Serial Number 3670 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 27, 2020
Serial Number 2665 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 26, 2020
Serial Number 2254 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 27, 2019
Serial Number 3051 was reported as accurate.
sandman39 12 · May 4, 2019
Serial Number 2963 was reported as accurate.
roxhan 2 · December 20, 2018
Serial Number 2330 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 22, 2018
Serial Number 3975 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 31, 2018
Serial Number 3168 was reported as accurate.
esoxhunter Top Contributor Supporter 127 · March 28, 2018
Serial Number 2467 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 6, 2018
Serial Number 3927 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 21, 2018
Serial Number 3915 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 13, 2018
Serial Number 2833 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 16, 2017
Serial Number 2662 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · December 1, 2017
Serial Number 3009 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 18, 2017
Serial Number 3957 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 9, 2017
Serial Number 3790 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 26, 2016
Serial Number 3155 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · February 28, 2016
Serial Number 3768 was reported as accurate.
mlat2012 Supporter 55 · February 27, 2016
Serial Number 3182 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 30, 2016
Serial Number 2504 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 17, 2016
Serial Number 3904 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 12, 2016
Serial Number 2340 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 22, 2015
Serial Number 3655 was reported as accurate.
watchman992 23 · September 19, 2015
Serial Number 2735 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 25, 2015
Serial Number 2784 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · August 11, 2015
Serial Number 3400 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 18, 2015
Serial Number 3127 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 6, 2014
Serial Number 3508 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 13, 2014
Serial Number 2214 was reported as accurate.
LeroyC 392 · June 1, 2014
Serial Number 2214 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 13, 2013
Serial Number 3874 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 14, 2013
Serial Number 2223 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 20, 2013
Serial Number 2713 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · December 25, 2012
Serial Number 2355 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 17, 2012
Serial Number 3127 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · August 18, 2012
Serial Number 3110 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 1, 2012
Serial Number 3950 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · August 1, 2012
Serial Number 3650 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 23, 2012
Serial Number 2386 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · May 11, 2012
Serial Number 2546 was reported as accurate.
-
From This Runuploaded by bob4watch
-
From This Runuploaded by mlat2012
-
From This Runuploaded by tturner770
-
From This Runuploaded by Bostonjoe
-
uploaded by Klinej54
-
uploaded by TimeAntiquarian
-
uploaded by TimeAntiquarian
-
uploaded by TimeAntiquarian
-
uploaded by Cheryl5150
-
uploaded by mbellich