Pocket Watch Database


From the American Horology Archive:
Hamilton Grade 992 Pocket Watch
Hamilton Grade 992 Pocket Watch

Hamilton Watch Co.

Grade: 992

Manufacturer: Hamilton Question Mark
Manufacturer Location: Lancaster, Pennsylvania Question Mark
Movement Serial Number: 863247 Question Mark
Grade: 992 Question Mark
Model: 1 Question Mark
Estimated Production Year: 1912 Question Mark
Run Quantity: 1,000 Question Mark
Grade/Model Run: 76 of 111 Question Mark
Grade/Model Total Production: 98,400 Question Mark
Size: 16s Question Mark
Jewels: 21j Question Mark
Jewel Material: Ruby & Sapphire Question Mark
Jewel Setting: Gold Settings (Screw-Set) Question Mark
Movement Configuration: Openface Question Mark
Movement Finish: Nickel Question Mark
Finish Pattern: 1st Pattern Question Mark
Movement Signing Style: Serif Caps Question Mark
Movement Inlay Color: Gilt Question Mark
Movement Setting: Lever Question Mark
Plate: 3/4 Plate Question Mark
Double Roller: Yes Question Mark
Barrel: Going Question Mark
Center Wheel Material: Gold Question Mark
Regulator: Reed Question Mark
Hairspring: Breguet Question Mark
Pallet Jewel Material: Sapphire Question Mark
Standard Dial Type: Double-Sunk Question Mark
Adjusted: Yes Question Mark
Adjusted to Position: Yes Question Mark
Adjusted # of Positions: 5 Question Mark
Adjusted to Temperature: Yes Question Mark
Adjusted to Isochronism: Yes Question Mark
Adjustment Tolerance: DUvDD: +/- 6 sec.; 5Pv: +/- 10 sec.; Total Average: +3-6 sec. per day; Temperature: +/- 6 Seconds Question Mark
Railroad Grade: Yes Question Mark
Dial Feet Locations: 7.6, 21.8, 38.0, 50.5
Hamilton 16s Dial Feet Research
Question Mark
Movement Markings: Hamilton Watch Co.
Lancaster, Pa.
21 Jewels
Double Roller
Adjusted
5 Positions
Case: Various Question Mark
Run ID: 1377.992G76.16S704.161M645.O870.L914.21J373 Question Mark
Data Research: 1953 Hamilton Serial List
Question Mark
Database Version: v52.516 Question Mark
Advanced Metrics
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index:
Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
296.26 Question Mark
PWDB Relative Rarity Index:
Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
129.99 Question Mark
Share of Production:
Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration
0.924% Question Mark
Registry Population:
Scoped for This Run Only
14 (1.40%) Question Mark
$ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): 9.17% Analyzing 3,586 Sales Question Mark

Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:

Does this information describe your movement accurately?

Verification Reports for this Run

The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.


Anonymous · September 13, 2022

Serial Number 863980 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · April 2, 2021

Serial Number 863901 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · February 20, 2021

Serial Number 863778 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · February 16, 2021

Serial Number 863778 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · December 27, 2019

Serial Number 863887 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · June 27, 2018

Serial Number 863680 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · November 9, 2017

Serial Number 863386 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 22, 2017

Serial Number 863738 was reported as inaccurate.

No further details were submitted with the report.
Changes since this report was submitted:
Railroad Grade changed from ? to Yes

Anonymous · October 28, 2016

Serial Number 863531 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Railroad Grade changed from ? to Yes

Anonymous · March 16, 2016

Serial Number 863673 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Railroad Grade changed from ? to Yes

Anonymous · February 25, 2015

Serial Number 863744 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Everything seems accurate, but are not ALL 992's
of Railroad Grade ?? Your report above says only
"?".
Curator Response: No, not all 992s are considered railroad grade. Many are pendant-set, which would not have been accepted for railroad use during this era. Currently, this range is in question because we are unsure if these are pendant-set or lever-set.
Changes since this report was submitted:
Railroad Grade changed from ? to Yes

Anonymous · April 18, 2013

Serial Number 863379 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Factory Model changed from 18 to 1
Double Roller changed from No to Yes

Anonymous · December 9, 2012

Serial Number 863957 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Factory Model changed from 18 to 1
Double Roller changed from No to Yes

Anonymous · December 9, 2012

Serial Number 863957 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Factory Model changed from 18 to 1
Double Roller changed from No to Yes

Anonymous · August 14, 2012

Serial Number 863375 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Factory Model changed from 18 to 1
Double Roller changed from No to Yes

Anonymous · July 24, 2012

Serial Number 863571 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Factory Model changed from 18 to 1
Double Roller changed from No to Yes

Anonymous · May 6, 2012

Serial Number 863040 was reported as accurate.

Changes since this report was submitted:
Factory Model changed from 18 to 1
Double Roller changed from No to Yes
Hamilton Grade 992 Pocket Watch
Hamilton Grade 992 Pocket Watch