Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/hamilton/C101816/movement
Access Date: December 14, 2024
From the American Horology Archive:
Hamilton Watch Co.
Grade: 992B
| Manufacturer: | Hamilton |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Lancaster, Pennsylvania | |
| Movement Serial Number: | C101816 | |
| Grade: | 992B | |
| Model: | 5 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1945 | |
| Run Quantity: | 24,700 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 6 of 32 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 531,750 | |
| Size: | 16s | |
| Jewels: | 21j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Lever | |
| Plate: | 3/4 Plate | |
| Adjusted: | Yes | |
| Adjusted # of Positions: | 6 | |
| Adjusted to Temperature: | Yes | |
| Railroad Grade: | Yes | |
| Dial Feet Locations: | 22.3, 38.0, 57.1
Hamilton 16s Dial Feet Research | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 2443.G6.16S1482.165M27.O1787.L1487.21J704 | |
| Data Research: |
1953 Hamilton Serial List |
|
| Database Version: | v52.508 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 1,600.98 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 702.46 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 4.991% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 30 (0.12%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | 0.36% Analyzing 7,837 Sales | |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 30 watches in the population registry for this run with 4 images.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
MoatsJustin1 top-contributor 5272 · October 24, 2024
Serial Number C108252 was reported as accurate.
pmtime Supporter 612 · October 14, 2024
Serial Number C111018 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 3, 2024
Serial Number C109708 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 6, 2024
Serial Number C93215 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · June 16, 2024
Serial Number C93979 was reported as accurate.
Mobilaero Top Contributor Supporter 307 · June 4, 2024
Serial Number C108449 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 11, 2024
Serial Number C107107 was reported as accurate.
okiejohn 393 · February 3, 2024
Serial Number C87930 was reported as inaccurate.
matches.
Anonymous · November 17, 2023
Serial Number C102286 was reported as accurate.
okiejohn 393 · November 2, 2023
Serial Number C105166 was reported as accurate.
okiejohn 393 · September 25, 2023
Serial Number C104048 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 6, 2023
Serial Number C96101 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 24, 2023
Serial Number C89386 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 4, 2023
Serial Number C110219 was reported as accurate.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · February 17, 2023
Serial Number C108660 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 7, 2022
Serial Number C105762 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 21, 2022
Serial Number C90019 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 4, 2022
Serial Number C110065 was reported as accurate.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · October 1, 2022
Serial Number C104525 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 26, 2022
Serial Number C98333 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 30, 2022
Serial Number C111472 was reported as accurate.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · July 17, 2022
Serial Number C111472 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 2, 2022
Serial Number C93046 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 17, 2022
Serial Number C93046 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 1, 2022
Serial Number C100885 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 2, 2022
Serial Number C89910 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 17, 2022
Serial Number C98772 was reported as accurate.
rmwatchandclock Supporter 377 · January 16, 2022
Serial Number C112391 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 31, 2021
Serial Number C99118 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 1, 2021
Serial Number C99280 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 3, 2021
Serial Number C102631 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 20, 2021
Serial Number C94617 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 9, 2021
Serial Number C108832 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 27, 2021
Serial Number C91852 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 21, 2021
Serial Number C91852 was reported as accurate.
Scuba75 Supporter 34 · August 19, 2021
Serial Number C101175 was reported as accurate.
cmdraven 4083 · August 10, 2021
Serial Number C106304 was reported as accurate.
steve288 264 · August 3, 2021
Serial Number C91004 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 6, 2021
Serial Number C91874 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 17, 2021
Serial Number C90016 was reported as accurate.
brianwatches 53 · June 8, 2021
Serial Number C98057 was reported as accurate.
brianwatches 53 · June 8, 2021
Serial Number C98057 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 4, 2021
Serial Number C103694 was reported as accurate.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · May 29, 2021
Serial Number C108961 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 26, 2021
Serial Number C97709 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 26, 2021
Serial Number C104401 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 22, 2021
Serial Number C112163 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 3, 2021
Serial Number C110967 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 1, 2021
Serial Number C109930 was reported as accurate.
avpalermo Supporter 644 · April 28, 2021
Serial Number C105016 was reported as accurate.
-
From This Runuploaded by Banjo777
-
From This Runuploaded by DEzzyD
-
From This Runuploaded by JoeyJohnson
-
From This Runuploaded by Kozzzz
-
From This Runuploaded by slufdriver
-
From This Runuploaded by okiejohn
-
From This Runuploaded by orsogrigio
-
From This Runuploaded by okiejohn
-
From This Runuploaded by brianwatches
-
From This Runuploaded by Alan4321