Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/hamilton/S875/movement
Access Date: November 25, 2024
"S875" could possibly indicate the grade of the watch and not the serial number of your movement. Serial numbers are usually more than a few digits.
From the American Horology Archive:
Hamilton Watch Co.
Grade: 950B
| Manufacturer: | Hamilton |  |
| Manufacturer Location: | Lancaster, Pennsylvania | |
| Movement Serial Number: | S875 | |
| Grade: | 950B | |
| Model: | 6 | |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1942 | |
| Run Quantity: | 1,100 | |
| Grade/Model Run: | 2 of 19 | |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 32,700 | |
| Size: | 16s | |
| Jewels: | 23j | |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
| Movement Setting: | Lever | |
| Plate: | Bridge Plate | |
| Bridge Type: | Center | |
| Train Material: | Gold | |
| Adjusted: | Yes | |
| Adjusted to Position: | Yes | |
| Adjusted # of Positions: | 6 | |
| Adjusted to Temperature: | Yes | |
| Adjusted to Isochronism: | Yes | |
| Railroad Grade: | Yes | |
| Dial Feet Locations: | 22.3, 38.0, 57.1
Hamilton 16s Dial Feet Research | |
| Case: | Various | |
| Run ID: | 2617.G2.16S1511.166M2.O1828.L1501.23J101 | |
| Data Research: |
1953 Hamilton Serial List |
|
| Database Version: | v52.462 | |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 98.45 | |
| PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 43.20 | |
| Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration | 0.307% | |
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 13 (1.18%) | |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | 4.95% Analyzing 858 Sales | |
Population Registry for This Run
| Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
There are 13 watches in the population registry for this run with 5 images.
|
|||||
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
cjbrem Supporter 916 · December 4, 2023
Serial Number S942 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 24, 2023
Serial Number S791 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 25, 2022
Serial Number S078 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 13, 2022
Serial Number S304 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 16, 2021
Serial Number S444 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 24, 2021
Serial Number S188 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 24, 2020
Serial Number S507 was reported as accurate.
Thaigr 6 · July 28, 2020
Serial Number S293 was reported as accurate.
densgems 6 · May 8, 2020
Serial Number S499 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 8, 2019
Serial Number S432 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 6, 2019
Serial Number S1077 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 13, 2019
Serial Number S944 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 6, 2018
Serial Number S610 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 27, 2018
Serial Number S084 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 19, 2018
Serial Number S084 was reported as accurate.
antdale83 2 · March 1, 2018
Serial Number S575 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 10, 2018
Serial Number S1070 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 24, 2017
Serial Number S0491 was reported as accurate.
Jawilson 1 · January 10, 2017
Serial Number S499 was reported as accurate.
Bulldog1964 7 · September 22, 2016
Serial Number S067 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 13, 2016
Serial Number S807 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 2, 2016
Serial Number S892 was reported as accurate.
bwalder 137 · December 30, 2015
Serial Number S976 was reported as accurate.
Gasperoff Supporter 727 · November 18, 2015
Serial Number S759 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 14, 2015
Serial Number S307 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 27, 2015
Serial Number S744 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 26, 2015
Serial Number S529 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 14, 2015
Serial Number S529 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 17, 2015
Serial Number S899 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 4, 2015
Serial Number S973 was reported as accurate.
walter2 56 · April 25, 2015
Serial Number S264 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 9, 2014
Serial Number S182 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 3, 2014
Serial Number S182 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 17, 2014
Serial Number S338 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 23, 2014
Serial Number S078 was reported as accurate.
axp950b 2 · March 20, 2014
Serial Number S856 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 31, 2014
Serial Number S856 was reported as accurate.
rocket00 236 · January 29, 2014
Serial Number S856 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 16, 2013
Serial Number S182 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 15, 2013
Serial Number S033 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 4, 2013
Serial Number S409 was reported as accurate.
jbrad92 2 · July 25, 2013
Serial Number S033 was reported as accurate.
eparso 59 · July 16, 2013
Serial Number S078 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 11, 2012
Serial Number S944 was reported as accurate.
-
From This Runuploaded by db2469
-
From This Runuploaded by pedrokeith
-
From This Runuploaded by yrazis
-
From This Runuploaded by Lord17
-
uploaded by DEzzyD
-
From This Runuploaded by walter2
-
From This Runuploaded by don1946
-
From This Runuploaded by Bulldog1964
-
uploaded by bwalder
-
uploaded by rgvbgrgvbg