The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.

TerryfromCanada Supporter 486 · November 15, 2021

Serial Number 367807 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: The movement is accurate. The watch face is a
Private label signed to J. Biddlecombe, Clinton
Ont.

Anonymous · June 25, 2020

Serial Number 367865 was reported as accurate.

wicozani 74 · August 17, 2019

Serial Number 367060 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · March 17, 2019

Serial Number 367174 was reported as accurate.

Noparking3 7 · January 12, 2019

Serial Number 367174 was reported as accurate.

Noparking3 7 · January 12, 2019

Serial Number 367174 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · January 12, 2019

Serial Number 367174 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · August 7, 2017

Serial Number 367938 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · July 18, 2015

Serial Number 367865 was reported as accurate.

ChrisG Top Contributor Supporter 608 · May 6, 2014

Serial Number 367783 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Model 7 is erroneous. Rockford parts catalog shows
2 types of index of this style. They are for
models 1, 2, 4 & 6
Not sure which one of the four it is.

Anonymous · April 2, 2014

Serial Number 367783 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Regulator arm is long type, over-slung to the
index plate mounted on the movement.

Regulator index is not on the balance cock for
this serial number.

Anonymous · October 11, 2013

Serial Number 367248 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: watch man at julery store says it is railroad
grade

Curator Response: If the movement does indeed have 11 jewels, it would not be considered Railroad Grade.

Anonymous · June 2, 2013

Serial Number 367396 was reported as accurate.