Pocket Watch Database


From the American Horology Archive:

Rockford Watch Co.

Grade: 945

Manufacturer: Rockford Question Mark
Manufacturer Location: Rockford, Illinois Question Mark
Movement Serial Number: 932008 Question Mark
Grade: 945 Question Mark
Model: Special Question Mark
Estimated Production Year: Login to View Question Mark
Run Quantity: Login to View Question Mark
Grade/Model Run: Login to View Question Mark
Grade/Model Total Production: Login to View Question Mark
Size: 18s Question Mark
Jewels: 21j Question Mark
Jewel Material: Login to View Question Mark
Jewel Setting: Login to View Question Mark
Movement Configuration: Openface Question Mark
Movement Finish: Nickel Question Mark
Movement Setting: Lever Question Mark
Wind Mechanism: Stem Question Mark
Plate: Full Plate Question Mark
Balance Type: Expansion Question Mark
Regulator: Login to View Question Mark
Hairspring: Login to View Question Mark
Adjusted: Login to View Question Mark
Adjusted to Position: Login to View Question Mark
Adjusted to Temperature: Login to View Question Mark
Railroad Grade: Login to View Question Mark
Movement Markings: Login to View
Case: Various Question Mark
Run ID: 1324.945G7.18S813.M8.O557.L845.21J128 Question Mark
Data Research: 1907 Rockford Serial List
Question Mark
Database Version: v52.645 Question Mark
Advanced Metrics
Members Only Data. Login or create a free account to unlock.
Registry Population:
Scoped for This Run Only
9 (0.90%) Question Mark
13 Additional Member-Only Data Points Available

The following information is unlocked with a free account:

Estimated Production Year, Run Quantity, Grade/Model Run, Grade/Model Total Production, Jewel Material, Jewel Setting, Regulator Type, Hairspring, Adjustments, Adjusted to Position, Temperature Adjustments, Railroad Grade Designation, Movement Markings

Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:

Does this information describe your movement accurately?

Verification Reports for this Run

The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.


cbzimm Supporter 498 · September 17, 2023

Serial Number 932195 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · September 15, 2023

Serial Number 932090 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · June 27, 2023

Serial Number 932370 was reported as accurate.

GT350me 30 · May 26, 2021

Serial Number 932303 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · August 30, 2020

Serial Number 932801 was reported as accurate.

jrclocker Supporter 6 · September 16, 2019

Serial Number 932740 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: It is a 17 jewel not a 21 jewel
Curator Response: Thanks for the report. If possible, please upload an image of the movement to your collection for further evaluation and documentation.

Anonymous · February 17, 2019

Serial Number 932067 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Note: Not Marked King Edward, but is grade 945,
21j,
adjusted heat & cold. Model 9. cheers duffy l.

Anonymous · June 9, 2018

Serial Number 932246 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · May 9, 2017

Serial Number 932280 was reported as accurate.

Flyskippy1 29 · February 2, 2014

Serial Number 932059 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Not Marked King Edward, but is grade 945, 21j,
adjusted heat & cold. Model 9