The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.

cbzimm Supporter 469 · September 17, 2023

Serial Number 932195 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · September 15, 2023

Serial Number 932090 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · June 27, 2023

Serial Number 932370 was reported as accurate.

GT350me 29 · May 26, 2021

Serial Number 932303 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · August 30, 2020

Serial Number 932801 was reported as accurate.

jrclocker Supporter 6 · September 16, 2019

Serial Number 932740 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: It is a 17 jewel not a 21 jewel

Curator Response: Thanks for the report. If possible, please upload an image of the movement to your collection for further evaluation and documentation.

Anonymous · February 17, 2019

Serial Number 932067 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Note: Not Marked King Edward, but is grade 945,
21j,
adjusted heat & cold. Model 9. cheers duffy l.

Anonymous · June 9, 2018

Serial Number 932246 was reported as accurate.

Anonymous · May 9, 2017

Serial Number 932280 was reported as accurate.

Flyskippy1 29 · February 2, 2014

Serial Number 932059 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Not Marked King Edward, but is grade 945, 21j,
adjusted heat & cold. Model 9